Examining Belongingness, Uniqueness, and Inclusivity Within a Land-Grant University Agricultural and Life Sciences Institute

Whitney Stone, O. Caillouet, Annie Muscato, C. Silvert, J. Diaz
{"title":"Examining Belongingness, Uniqueness, and Inclusivity Within a Land-Grant University Agricultural and Life Sciences Institute","authors":"Whitney Stone, O. Caillouet, Annie Muscato, C. Silvert, J. Diaz","doi":"10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This mixed methods study aimed to explore the perceptions of employees’ belongingness, uniqueness, and inclusivity within the [Blinded University]. A survey with quantitative and qualitative questions was used for data collection from February to April 2021. Respondents were [Blinded University] employees, faculty, students, and Extension professionals (n = 430). White (non-Hispanic) Extension professional respondents reported significantly greater levels of organizational belongingness than Extension respondents classified as Other ethnicities. No other significant differences were found for the three constructs among Extension, main campus, or student respondents. The qualitative survey data converged with the quantitative survey data and provided a more complete understanding of respondents' perceptions of organizational diversity, equity, and inclusivity (DEI). Respondents indicated improvements are needed for diversity and inclusivity initiatives, resources, and training. Key recommendations were that [Blinded University] continue DEI initiatives while better tailoring efforts toward meeting the needs of Extension professionals and Hispanic students. Building on the foundational understanding garnered from the present study, future research should explore inclusivity beyond ethnicity and also consider gender, sexual orientation, and income levels. \nKeywords: belongingness, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion; Extension; uniqueness; land-grant university;","PeriodicalId":421640,"journal":{"name":"NACTA Journal","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NACTA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mixed methods study aimed to explore the perceptions of employees’ belongingness, uniqueness, and inclusivity within the [Blinded University]. A survey with quantitative and qualitative questions was used for data collection from February to April 2021. Respondents were [Blinded University] employees, faculty, students, and Extension professionals (n = 430). White (non-Hispanic) Extension professional respondents reported significantly greater levels of organizational belongingness than Extension respondents classified as Other ethnicities. No other significant differences were found for the three constructs among Extension, main campus, or student respondents. The qualitative survey data converged with the quantitative survey data and provided a more complete understanding of respondents' perceptions of organizational diversity, equity, and inclusivity (DEI). Respondents indicated improvements are needed for diversity and inclusivity initiatives, resources, and training. Key recommendations were that [Blinded University] continue DEI initiatives while better tailoring efforts toward meeting the needs of Extension professionals and Hispanic students. Building on the foundational understanding garnered from the present study, future research should explore inclusivity beyond ethnicity and also consider gender, sexual orientation, and income levels. Keywords: belongingness, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion; Extension; uniqueness; land-grant university;
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察赠地大学农业与生命科学研究所的归属、独特性和包容性
这项混合方法研究旨在探讨[盲法大学]员工的归属感、独特性和包容性。从2021年2月至4月,采用定量和定性调查的方式收集数据。受访者为[盲法大学]雇员、教师、学生和推广专业人员(n = 430)。白人(非西班牙裔)扩展专业受访者报告的组织归属感水平明显高于其他种族的扩展受访者。在扩展区、主校区和学生受访者中,这三个构念没有发现其他显著差异。定性调查数据与定量调查数据融合,更全面地了解了受访者对组织多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)的看法。受访者表示,需要在多样性和包容性倡议、资源和培训方面进行改进。关键的建议是[盲法大学]继续DEI倡议,同时更好地调整努力,以满足推广专业人员和西班牙裔学生的需求。基于从本研究中获得的基本理解,未来的研究应该探索超越种族的包容性,并考虑性别、性取向和收入水平。关键词:归属感、多样性、公平、包容;扩展;独特性;赠地大学;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Influencing Students’ Decisions to Engage in International Education Opportunities Post-COVID Study Abroad Programs and Student Stress: An Animal Science Curriculum Case Study Cyberbiosecurity Workforce Preparation From Reel to Real: Practical Tips for Implementing Inductive Learning with Film Examining Student Perceptions of Engagement and Learning in a Flipped Introductory Agricultural Mechanics Course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1