Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Combustion-Fuel Cell Cogeneration Plant: A Senior Design Project Case Study

V. Manno, Katherine K. Friend, E. R. Nelson
{"title":"Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Combustion-Fuel Cell Cogeneration Plant: A Senior Design Project Case Study","authors":"V. Manno, Katherine K. Friend, E. R. Nelson","doi":"10.1115/imece1999-1136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper is a case study of a senior level project on cogeneration for the Tufts University Medford, MA campus. Eight students were involved — six in the BSME program and two in the BSEnvE program. Through brainstorming and collaborative planning, students developed a “Proposal Document” which defined the study objectives, milestone schedules and deliverables. The student team was then divided into technical and project functional groups. Electronic communication was utilized but “face-to-face” meetings were crucial for maintaining progress. The student team evaluated whole campus and part-campus possibilities taking into account thermal and electrical demand profiles and local infrastructure. The outcome design featured a hybrid conventional combustion/molten carbonate fuel cell system to supply all electrical and partial thermal demands for a complex of buildings housing classrooms, gymnasium facilities and a new field house. Engineering specifications were developed and civil engineering and siting constraints were analyzed. Technology selection was driven not only by engineering constraints but also by student interest in exploring emerging technologies (fuel cells). The team presented written and oral reports to student peers, faculty, university personnel and outside experts.\n The paper provides an analysis of outcomes, assessments and satisfaction level. High course satisfaction and above average workloads were reported. The paper concludes with an elucidation of lessons learned including project execution, team makeup and background, the proper focus of design project courses, and the synthesis and integration of knowledge. Even in this small, relatively homogeneous mix of students, attention to bridging interdisciplinary gaps was required. Experience from this and similar courses indicate that the goal of capstone “synthesizing” experiences is flawed if the tendency towards “disciplinarity” in undergraduate education continues.","PeriodicalId":120929,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer: Volume 4","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer: Volume 4","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece1999-1136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is a case study of a senior level project on cogeneration for the Tufts University Medford, MA campus. Eight students were involved — six in the BSME program and two in the BSEnvE program. Through brainstorming and collaborative planning, students developed a “Proposal Document” which defined the study objectives, milestone schedules and deliverables. The student team was then divided into technical and project functional groups. Electronic communication was utilized but “face-to-face” meetings were crucial for maintaining progress. The student team evaluated whole campus and part-campus possibilities taking into account thermal and electrical demand profiles and local infrastructure. The outcome design featured a hybrid conventional combustion/molten carbonate fuel cell system to supply all electrical and partial thermal demands for a complex of buildings housing classrooms, gymnasium facilities and a new field house. Engineering specifications were developed and civil engineering and siting constraints were analyzed. Technology selection was driven not only by engineering constraints but also by student interest in exploring emerging technologies (fuel cells). The team presented written and oral reports to student peers, faculty, university personnel and outside experts. The paper provides an analysis of outcomes, assessments and satisfaction level. High course satisfaction and above average workloads were reported. The paper concludes with an elucidation of lessons learned including project execution, team makeup and background, the proper focus of design project courses, and the synthesis and integration of knowledge. Even in this small, relatively homogeneous mix of students, attention to bridging interdisciplinary gaps was required. Experience from this and similar courses indicate that the goal of capstone “synthesizing” experiences is flawed if the tendency towards “disciplinarity” in undergraduate education continues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合燃烧-燃料电池热电联产电厂的可行性研究:高级设计项目案例研究
本文是塔夫茨大学梅德福校区热电联产高级项目的案例研究。共有8名学生参与其中,其中6名来自BSME项目,2名来自BSEnvE项目。通过头脑风暴和协作计划,学生们制定了一份“提案文件”,其中定义了研究目标、里程碑时间表和可交付成果。然后将学生团队分为技术和项目功能组。利用了电子通讯,但“面对面”会议对于保持进展至关重要。学生团队评估了整个校园和部分校园的可能性,并考虑了热力和电力需求概况以及当地基础设施。最终的设计采用了混合传统燃烧/熔融碳酸盐燃料电池系统,为包含教室、体育馆设施和新场地的综合建筑提供所有电力和部分热需求。制定了工程规范,并分析了土木工程和选址限制。技术选择不仅受到工程限制的影响,还受到学生对探索新兴技术(燃料电池)的兴趣的影响。该团队向学生、教师、大学工作人员和外部专家提交了书面和口头报告。本文提供了结果、评估和满意度的分析。课程满意度高,工作量高于平均水平。论文最后对项目执行、团队组成和背景、设计项目课程的适当重点以及知识的综合和整合等方面的经验教训进行了阐述。即使在这样一个相对单一的学生群体中,也需要注意弥合跨学科的差距。这门课程和类似课程的经验表明,如果本科教育的“纪律化”趋势继续下去,那么“综合”经验的目标是有缺陷的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mass Transfer Process of Gaseous Carbon Dioxide Into Water Jet Through Orifice Mixing System A New Facility for Measurements of Three-Dimensional, Local Subcooled Flow Boiling Heat Flux and Related Critical Heat Flux Numerical Solution of Thermal and Fluid Flow With Phase Change by VOF Method Stacked Microchannel Heat Sinks for Liquid Cooling of Microelectronic Components Some Aspects of Critical-Heat-Flux Enhancement in Tubes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1