Modes and Patterns of Social Control: Implications for Human Rights Policy

Program on Human Rights and the Global Economy
{"title":"Modes and Patterns of Social Control: Implications for Human Rights Policy","authors":"Program on Human Rights and the Global Economy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1803591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modes and Patterns of Social Control: Implications for Human Rights Policy is the latest report of the International Council on Human Rights Policy. This report looks into the human rights implications of contemporary patterns of social control: how laws and policies construct and respond to people, behaviour or status defined as \"undesirable\", \"dangerous\", criminal or socially problematic. The report highlights common patterns of criminalisation, segregation, and surveillance – and how they are shaped by political economy, notions of risk and danger, and regimes of policy transfer. It explores the human rights implications of questions such as: How changing ideas of crime, criminality and risk are shaping social policy? Why does incarceration continue to be a preferred sanction? How are public health and urban governance being reshaped into regimes of discipline and punitiveness? How do contemporary policing and surveillance practices order and organise social relations? Despite the significant amount of research conducted around some of these themes, a considerable gap exists between those engaged in research and theory and those engaged in human rights advocacy and policy. This report seeks to bridge that gap. Drawing on research across five policy areas – infectious diseases, urban spaces and the poor, policing, migrants, and, punishment and incarceration – and a case study of the Roma in Europe, it is relevant to human rights advocates and professionals working in diverse policy areas. The report invites consideration of the value of a social control perspective in engaging with the policies and practices of relevant institutions in these areas. It underlines challenges and ways forward for human rights policy and advocacy with respect to: ideas of crime and criminality, penal sanctions, non-criminal sanctions and ‘soft’ controls, protection and victim rights, privatisation, surveillance, and policy transfer regimes. It is hoped that Modes and Patterns of Social Control provides a basis to mount a more robust human rights challenge to political and social forces that shape contemporary modes of social control through a dialogue between human rights advocates, critical social scientists, social policy analysts, experts, and policy makers.","PeriodicalId":106035,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights & the Global Economy eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights & the Global Economy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1803591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Modes and Patterns of Social Control: Implications for Human Rights Policy is the latest report of the International Council on Human Rights Policy. This report looks into the human rights implications of contemporary patterns of social control: how laws and policies construct and respond to people, behaviour or status defined as "undesirable", "dangerous", criminal or socially problematic. The report highlights common patterns of criminalisation, segregation, and surveillance – and how they are shaped by political economy, notions of risk and danger, and regimes of policy transfer. It explores the human rights implications of questions such as: How changing ideas of crime, criminality and risk are shaping social policy? Why does incarceration continue to be a preferred sanction? How are public health and urban governance being reshaped into regimes of discipline and punitiveness? How do contemporary policing and surveillance practices order and organise social relations? Despite the significant amount of research conducted around some of these themes, a considerable gap exists between those engaged in research and theory and those engaged in human rights advocacy and policy. This report seeks to bridge that gap. Drawing on research across five policy areas – infectious diseases, urban spaces and the poor, policing, migrants, and, punishment and incarceration – and a case study of the Roma in Europe, it is relevant to human rights advocates and professionals working in diverse policy areas. The report invites consideration of the value of a social control perspective in engaging with the policies and practices of relevant institutions in these areas. It underlines challenges and ways forward for human rights policy and advocacy with respect to: ideas of crime and criminality, penal sanctions, non-criminal sanctions and ‘soft’ controls, protection and victim rights, privatisation, surveillance, and policy transfer regimes. It is hoped that Modes and Patterns of Social Control provides a basis to mount a more robust human rights challenge to political and social forces that shape contemporary modes of social control through a dialogue between human rights advocates, critical social scientists, social policy analysts, experts, and policy makers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会控制的模式和模式:对人权政策的影响
《社会控制的模式和模式:对人权政策的影响》是国际人权政策理事会的最新报告。本报告探讨当代社会控制模式对人权的影响:法律和政策如何建构和回应被定义为“不受欢迎”、“危险”、犯罪或社会问题的人、行为或地位。该报告强调了刑事定罪、隔离和监视的常见模式,以及它们如何受到政治经济、风险和危险观念以及政策转移制度的影响。它探讨了以下问题对人权的影响:犯罪、犯罪和风险观念的变化如何影响社会政策?为什么监禁仍然是首选的制裁措施?公共卫生和城市治理如何被重塑为纪律和惩罚制度?当代的警务和监视实践是如何秩序和组织社会关系的?尽管围绕其中一些主题进行了大量研究,但从事研究和理论的人员与从事人权宣传和政策的人员之间存在着相当大的差距。本报告试图弥合这一差距。它借鉴了五个政策领域的研究成果——传染病、城市空间和穷人、警务、移民、惩罚和监禁——以及对欧洲罗姆人的个案研究,与在不同政策领域工作的人权倡导者和专业人士息息相关。该报告请考虑社会控制观点在处理这些领域的相关机构的政策和做法方面的价值。它强调了人权政策和倡导在以下方面的挑战和前进方向:犯罪和犯罪行为的概念、刑事制裁、非刑事制裁和“软”控制、保护和受害者权利、私有化、监视和政策转移制度。希望《社会控制的模式和模式》能够提供一个基础,通过人权倡导者、批判性社会科学家、社会政策分析家、专家和政策制定者之间的对话,向塑造当代社会控制模式的政治和社会力量发起更有力的人权挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Protection Instruments and Women Workers in the Informal Economy: A Southern African Perspective Using the Risk-Based Approach To Curb Modern Slavery in the Supply Chain: The Anglo American and Marks and Spencer Example From Creative Destruction to Destructive Creation Economic Analysis of Ethnic Conflicts Why Is Law Central to Public Policy Process in Global South?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1