The Fossil Fuel Industry’s Push to Target Climate Protesters in the U.S.

Grace Nosek
{"title":"The Fossil Fuel Industry’s Push to Target Climate Protesters in the U.S.","authors":"Grace Nosek","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the very moment when the United Nations has called for profound shifts in social and economic systems to avert climate catastrophe, state and non-state actors in the United States (U.S.) are using a series of tactics to target and stifle climate protesters. Although the move to stifle climate protesters is often framed as a government effort, this Article argues it is critical to draw out the role of the fossil fuel industry in initiating, amplifying, and supporting such tactics. \n \nThis Article highlights the role the fossil fuel industry has played in supporting the targeting and restricting of climate protesters in the U.S. The strategies for targeting protesters are grouped into three broad categories, with each category relying on distinctive legal tools. The first category is federal and state legislation that heightens penalties for climate protester in myriad ways. The second is the use of violence and surveillance against climate protesters by both state and non-state actors, which is connected to a rhetorical and legal push to label protesters as extremists and terrorists. The third is retaliatory lawsuits filed against climate protesters and organizations that support climate protests. Although such actions often ostensibly target civil disobedience, by imposing immense criminal and financial consequences, they threaten to unconstitutionally chill lawful, protected protest as well. \n \nBy examining the tactics in concert, it is much easier to see how both individual protesters and organizations that support protesters might be chilled from participating in lawful climate protest. It is also clear that there are important synergistic effects when these tactics are used together, heightening their respective abilities to undermine and chill climate protest. A third insight is how difficult it is for climate protesters to legally challenge these tactics. Finally, the analysis shows the pivotal role fossil fuel industry trade and lobbying groups play in targeting climate protesters, highlighting the breadth and depth of industry support for such tactics.","PeriodicalId":136205,"journal":{"name":"Pace Environmental Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/0738-6206.1844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

At the very moment when the United Nations has called for profound shifts in social and economic systems to avert climate catastrophe, state and non-state actors in the United States (U.S.) are using a series of tactics to target and stifle climate protesters. Although the move to stifle climate protesters is often framed as a government effort, this Article argues it is critical to draw out the role of the fossil fuel industry in initiating, amplifying, and supporting such tactics. This Article highlights the role the fossil fuel industry has played in supporting the targeting and restricting of climate protesters in the U.S. The strategies for targeting protesters are grouped into three broad categories, with each category relying on distinctive legal tools. The first category is federal and state legislation that heightens penalties for climate protester in myriad ways. The second is the use of violence and surveillance against climate protesters by both state and non-state actors, which is connected to a rhetorical and legal push to label protesters as extremists and terrorists. The third is retaliatory lawsuits filed against climate protesters and organizations that support climate protests. Although such actions often ostensibly target civil disobedience, by imposing immense criminal and financial consequences, they threaten to unconstitutionally chill lawful, protected protest as well. By examining the tactics in concert, it is much easier to see how both individual protesters and organizations that support protesters might be chilled from participating in lawful climate protest. It is also clear that there are important synergistic effects when these tactics are used together, heightening their respective abilities to undermine and chill climate protest. A third insight is how difficult it is for climate protesters to legally challenge these tactics. Finally, the analysis shows the pivotal role fossil fuel industry trade and lobbying groups play in targeting climate protesters, highlighting the breadth and depth of industry support for such tactics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国化石燃料行业将矛头指向气候抗议者
就在联合国呼吁深刻改变社会和经济制度以避免气候灾难的时刻,美国的国家和非国家行为体正在使用一系列策略来瞄准和扼杀气候抗议者。尽管压制气候抗议者的行动经常被认为是政府的努力,但本文认为,找出化石燃料行业在发起、放大和支持此类策略方面的作用至关重要。本文重点介绍了化石燃料行业在支持锁定和限制美国气候抗议者方面所发挥的作用。针对抗议者的策略分为三大类,每一类都依赖于不同的法律工具。第一类是联邦和州立法,以各种方式加强对气候抗议者的惩罚。第二个是国家和非国家行为体对气候抗议者使用暴力和监视,这与将抗议者贴上极端分子和恐怖分子的修辞和法律推动有关。第三种是针对气候抗议者和支持气候抗议的组织提起的报复性诉讼。虽然这些行动通常表面上是针对公民不服从,但通过施加巨大的刑事和经济后果,它们也有可能违宪地冻结合法的、受保护的抗议活动。通过对这些策略的综合考察,我们更容易看到,抗议者个人和支持抗议者的组织是如何被吓得不敢参加合法的气候抗议活动的。同样清楚的是,当这些策略一起使用时,会产生重要的协同效应,提高它们各自削弱和遏制气候抗议的能力。第三个洞见是,气候抗议者很难合法地挑战这些策略。最后,分析显示了化石燃料行业贸易和游说团体在针对气候抗议者方面发挥的关键作用,突出了行业支持此类策略的广度和深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Green Future and the Golden Past: Issues and Approaches Regarding the Sustainability of Historical Structures and Sites Virtuous Cycles: The Interaction of Public and Private Environmental Governance The Need to Reconceptualize Wild Animals Post-COVID 19: Miscoordination of Wildlife Regulations in China’s Food Legal Order Racial Impact Assessment in Land Use Planning and Zoning Environmental Law for the 21st Century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1