ANTIPLATELET THERAPY AND SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS AFTER CORONARY BYPASS SURGERY IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME

Jalilov A.K., I. R.G.
{"title":"ANTIPLATELET THERAPY AND SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS AFTER CORONARY BYPASS SURGERY IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME","authors":"Jalilov A.K., I. R.G.","doi":"10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2021-23-9-45-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has clear advantages in reducing serious adverse cardiovascular events and mortality following acute coronary syndrome. Although these drugs may pose an additional risk of bleeding in the small percentage of acute coronary syndrome patients who will undergo coronary artery bypass grafting, the benefits are vastly superior, and most bleeding can be reduced, if possible, by delaying coronary artery bypass grafting. Short-acting anticoagulants can be administered flexibly, allowing platelet function to be restored after clopidogrel is discontinued. The postoperative bleeding time may clarify the need for platelet transfusion in case of bleeding. Coronary artery bypass grafting without the use of a heart-lung machine may offer some benefits by avoiding heparinization and the inflammatory response associated with bypass surgery. Secondary prophylaxis with antiplatelet therapy, beta-blockers, lipid-lowering therapy, and ACE inhibitors or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is critical to the long-term success of revascularization. In this regard, it should be borne in mind that regardless of the method of revascularization, patients with acute coronary syndrome are characterized by the clinical benefit of taking antiplatelet agents such as aspirin and clopidogrel, since these drugs reduce the risk of serious adverse events. On the other hand, antiplatelet agents also increase the risk of bleeding in patients who will eventually undergo coronary artery bypass grafting. However, scientists indicate that in most cases, the benefits of early initiation of antiplatelet therapy outweigh the potential risks [1]. In addition, the beneficial effects of aspirin and clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome are additive. In the study of clopidogrel, indicated for the prevention of recurrence of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, patients taking both clopidogrel and aspirin were less likely to die of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or stroke at 30 days and 1 year compared with patients who took only aspirin [22]. All these studies confirm that antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel should be carried out in the early stages of acute coronary syndrome. In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, clopidogrel improves outcomes in addition to aspirin. In a trial of clopidogrel and metoprolol for myocardial infarction, clopidogrel, in addition to aspirin, was associated with a significant reduction in death, re-heart attack, or stroke compared with aspirin alone [14].","PeriodicalId":445713,"journal":{"name":"\"Medical & pharmaceutical journal \"Pulse\"","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"Medical & pharmaceutical journal \"Pulse\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2021-23-9-45-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has clear advantages in reducing serious adverse cardiovascular events and mortality following acute coronary syndrome. Although these drugs may pose an additional risk of bleeding in the small percentage of acute coronary syndrome patients who will undergo coronary artery bypass grafting, the benefits are vastly superior, and most bleeding can be reduced, if possible, by delaying coronary artery bypass grafting. Short-acting anticoagulants can be administered flexibly, allowing platelet function to be restored after clopidogrel is discontinued. The postoperative bleeding time may clarify the need for platelet transfusion in case of bleeding. Coronary artery bypass grafting without the use of a heart-lung machine may offer some benefits by avoiding heparinization and the inflammatory response associated with bypass surgery. Secondary prophylaxis with antiplatelet therapy, beta-blockers, lipid-lowering therapy, and ACE inhibitors or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is critical to the long-term success of revascularization. In this regard, it should be borne in mind that regardless of the method of revascularization, patients with acute coronary syndrome are characterized by the clinical benefit of taking antiplatelet agents such as aspirin and clopidogrel, since these drugs reduce the risk of serious adverse events. On the other hand, antiplatelet agents also increase the risk of bleeding in patients who will eventually undergo coronary artery bypass grafting. However, scientists indicate that in most cases, the benefits of early initiation of antiplatelet therapy outweigh the potential risks [1]. In addition, the beneficial effects of aspirin and clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome are additive. In the study of clopidogrel, indicated for the prevention of recurrence of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, patients taking both clopidogrel and aspirin were less likely to die of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or stroke at 30 days and 1 year compared with patients who took only aspirin [22]. All these studies confirm that antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel should be carried out in the early stages of acute coronary syndrome. In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, clopidogrel improves outcomes in addition to aspirin. In a trial of clopidogrel and metoprolol for myocardial infarction, clopidogrel, in addition to aspirin, was associated with a significant reduction in death, re-heart attack, or stroke compared with aspirin alone [14].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性冠脉综合征冠状动脉搭桥术后抗血小板治疗及二级预防
阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗在减少急性冠状动脉综合征后的严重不良心血管事件和死亡率方面具有明显的优势。虽然这些药物可能会对一小部分接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的急性冠状动脉综合征患者造成额外的出血风险,但其好处是非常优越的,并且如果可能的话,通过延迟冠状动脉旁路移植术可以减少大多数出血。短效抗凝剂可以灵活使用,在停用氯吡格雷后,可以恢复血小板功能。术后出血时间可以明确出血时是否需要输血小板。不使用心肺机的冠状动脉旁路移植术可以避免肝素化和与旁路手术相关的炎症反应,从而提供一些好处。二级预防包括抗血小板治疗、β受体阻滞剂、降脂治疗、ACE抑制剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对血管重建术的长期成功至关重要。在这方面,应该记住,无论采用何种方法进行血运重建,急性冠状动脉综合征患者的特点是服用抗血小板药物(如阿司匹林和氯吡格雷)具有临床益处,因为这些药物可以降低严重不良事件的风险。另一方面,抗血小板药物也会增加最终接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者出血的风险。然而,科学家指出,在大多数情况下,早期开始抗血小板治疗的益处大于潜在的风险[1]。此外,阿司匹林和氯吡格雷对急性冠脉综合征的有益作用是叠加的。在氯吡格雷用于预防不稳定型心绞痛和非st段抬高型心肌梗死复发的研究中,与仅服用阿司匹林的患者相比,同时服用氯吡格雷和阿司匹林的患者在30天和1年内死于心源性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死或卒中的可能性更低[22]。所有这些研究证实,在急性冠状动脉综合征的早期应进行阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗。对于st段抬高型心肌梗死患者,除阿司匹林外,氯吡格雷可改善预后。在一项氯吡格雷和美托洛尔联合治疗心肌梗死的试验中,与单独使用阿司匹林相比,氯吡格雷和阿司匹林可显著降低死亡、再次心脏病发作或中风的发生率[14]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE RISK OF DEVELOPING GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER IN WOMEN AFTER AN IN VITRO FERTILIZATION PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF THE AVAILABILITY AND EFFICIENCY OF MEDICAL CARE PROVIDED TO PATIENTS IN THE PROFILE "MEDICAL REHABILITATION" IN ASTRAKHAN REGION CLINICAL AND PROGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR THE COMPLICATED COURSE OF NEW CORONAVIRUS INFECTION (COVID-19). DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPOSITION AND TECHNOLOGY OF SEDATIVE FILMS OPTIMIZATION OF TREATMENT OF TUBAL-PERITONEAL INFERTILITY CAUSED BY CHRONIC SALPINGITIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1