The Impact of Skin in the Game on Bank Behavior in the Securitization Market

Martin Hibbeln, W. Osterkamp
{"title":"The Impact of Skin in the Game on Bank Behavior in the Securitization Market","authors":"Martin Hibbeln, W. Osterkamp","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3528090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on European RMBS deals with 24 million quarterly loan observations, we examine the effect of risk retention on bank behavior. Using OLS, propensity score matching, and instrumental variable regressions, we examine why retention deals perform better. Analyzing monitoring effort and the workout process, we find that the probability of rating updates or collateral revaluations is higher, and the rating quality is better. Retention loans have a lower probability of becoming non-performing, a lower delinquency amount, and a shorter time in arrears. Moreover, non-performing and defaulted retention loans are more likely to recover. We observe that total losses are lower for deals with retention, which are driven by lower default rates, lower exposures at default, and higher recovery rates. Overall, our results suggest that retention reduces moral hazard and incentivizes banks to exert higher effort, which results in superior securitized asset performance.","PeriodicalId":414741,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Financial Markets Regulation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3528090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Based on European RMBS deals with 24 million quarterly loan observations, we examine the effect of risk retention on bank behavior. Using OLS, propensity score matching, and instrumental variable regressions, we examine why retention deals perform better. Analyzing monitoring effort and the workout process, we find that the probability of rating updates or collateral revaluations is higher, and the rating quality is better. Retention loans have a lower probability of becoming non-performing, a lower delinquency amount, and a shorter time in arrears. Moreover, non-performing and defaulted retention loans are more likely to recover. We observe that total losses are lower for deals with retention, which are driven by lower default rates, lower exposures at default, and higher recovery rates. Overall, our results suggest that retention reduces moral hazard and incentivizes banks to exert higher effort, which results in superior securitized asset performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博弈利益对证券化市场中银行行为的影响
基于欧洲RMBS交易的2400万季度贷款观察,我们研究了风险保留对银行行为的影响。使用OLS、倾向得分匹配和工具变量回归,我们研究了留存交易表现更好的原因。通过对监控工作量和运行过程的分析,我们发现评级更新或抵押品重估的概率更高,评级质量也更好。保留贷款成为不良贷款的可能性较低,拖欠金额较低,拖欠时间较短。此外,不良和违约的保留贷款更有可能收回。我们观察到,保留交易的总损失较低,这是由较低的违约率、较低的违约风险和较高的回收率驱动的。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,保留降低了道德风险,激励银行付出更高的努力,从而导致更好的证券化资产绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic CoVaR Third Party Monitoring, Regulatory Compliance and Financial Reporting: Evidence from Banking Who watches the Auctioneer? Supervising primary bond markets to reduce agency costs MiCA and DeFi ('Proposal for a Regulation on Market in Crypto-Assets' and 'Decentralised Finance') COVID-19, Credit Risk and Macro Fundamentals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1