Geospatial editing over a federated cloud geodatabase for the state of NSW

K. K. Janakiraman, M. Orgun, Abhaya C. Nayak
{"title":"Geospatial editing over a federated cloud geodatabase for the state of NSW","authors":"K. K. Janakiraman, M. Orgun, Abhaya C. Nayak","doi":"10.1145/1869790.1869813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geospatial information changes continually, and geospatial datasets become outdated and unsuitable for decision support due to inadequate data quality. They are also costly to maintain. There is a growing demand for accurate and consistent geospatial information in critical sectors such as emergency response.\n Within the land fabric geospatial vector data context, the ownership of data is distributed vertically among many government agencies by thematic types and horizontally by different administrative domains. A geospatial transaction, that updates changes, say for example, the release of a portion of forest-land for residential development, could inherently span across multiple agencies, infringing the jurisdictional responsibilities of individual agencies who own the participating data layers. Unauthorized editing and even publishing of updated data takes place in different organizations, unaware of editing taking place in other agencies. While updating of geospatial datasets for improved accuracy and distribution takes place, the legal aspects are generally ignored.\n In the context of current jurisdictional structure, to avoid duplicate geospatial editing as well as to support legally binding transaction, a geodatabase must transcend organizational boundaries and become truly federated. In addition, it needs to support a mechanism for versioned geospatial editing and more importantly support commits that could span many days. In this paper, we present a versioned editing model for a geospatial cloud database environment. The paper also discusses a new data workflow paradigm that utilizes the salient features of cloud for updating geospatial data addressing the issues highlighted. This is followed by a succinct discussion of the controlled investigation of the paradigm for the case of Australia's NSW state.","PeriodicalId":359068,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Advances in Geographic Information Systems","volume":"251 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Advances in Geographic Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1869790.1869813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Geospatial information changes continually, and geospatial datasets become outdated and unsuitable for decision support due to inadequate data quality. They are also costly to maintain. There is a growing demand for accurate and consistent geospatial information in critical sectors such as emergency response. Within the land fabric geospatial vector data context, the ownership of data is distributed vertically among many government agencies by thematic types and horizontally by different administrative domains. A geospatial transaction, that updates changes, say for example, the release of a portion of forest-land for residential development, could inherently span across multiple agencies, infringing the jurisdictional responsibilities of individual agencies who own the participating data layers. Unauthorized editing and even publishing of updated data takes place in different organizations, unaware of editing taking place in other agencies. While updating of geospatial datasets for improved accuracy and distribution takes place, the legal aspects are generally ignored. In the context of current jurisdictional structure, to avoid duplicate geospatial editing as well as to support legally binding transaction, a geodatabase must transcend organizational boundaries and become truly federated. In addition, it needs to support a mechanism for versioned geospatial editing and more importantly support commits that could span many days. In this paper, we present a versioned editing model for a geospatial cloud database environment. The paper also discusses a new data workflow paradigm that utilizes the salient features of cloud for updating geospatial data addressing the issues highlighted. This is followed by a succinct discussion of the controlled investigation of the paradigm for the case of Australia's NSW state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新南威尔士州联邦云地理数据库上进行地理空间编辑
地理空间信息不断变化,由于数据质量不足,地理空间数据集已经过时,不适合用于决策支持。它们的维护成本也很高。在诸如应急反应等关键部门,对准确和一致的地理空间信息的需求日益增加。在土地结构地理空间矢量数据上下文中,数据的所有权按主题类型垂直分布在许多政府机构之间,并按不同的管理领域横向分布。地理空间交易,更新变化,例如,释放一部分林地用于住宅开发,本质上可能跨越多个机构,侵犯拥有参与数据层的单个机构的管辖责任。未经授权的编辑甚至发布更新的数据发生在不同的组织中,而不知道其他机构正在进行编辑。在更新地理空间数据集以提高准确性和分布的同时,法律方面通常被忽视。在当前管辖权结构的背景下,为了避免重复的地理空间编辑以及支持具有法律约束力的事务,地理数据库必须超越组织边界并成为真正的联邦。此外,它还需要支持版本化的地理空间编辑机制,更重要的是,它还需要支持可能跨越许多天的提交。本文提出了一种地理空间云数据库环境下的版本化编辑模型。本文还讨论了一种新的数据工作流范例,该范例利用云的显著特征来更新地理空间数据,解决了突出的问题。接下来是对澳大利亚新南威尔士州案例的对照调查的简要讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pai Geolocation Time Geography Stationarity Cognitive Mapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1