Daesoon Thought Explained Through the Philosophy of the Book of Change

Young-jin Choi
{"title":"Daesoon Thought Explained Through the Philosophy of the Book of Change","authors":"Young-jin Choi","doi":"10.25050/jdaos.2009.20.0.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Four Tenets of Daesoon thought are the Creative conjunction of the virtues of Eum and Yang, the Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings, the Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life and the Realization of the Dao in the world. This article compares the concepts of the “Creative conjunction of the virtues of Eum and Yang”, the “Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings” and the “Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life” with “EumYangDaeDaeRon”, “ShinMyonKiDeok”, the Theory of Mutual Giving Life / Mutual Destruction (SangSaeng/SangGeukRon) of the Book of Changes and analyzes their common and different points. The conclusion is that Daesoon thought and the philosophy of the Book of Changes share common fundamental standpoints. However, the Daesoon thought defines the world of SeonCheon (the state before the Heaven and Earth have been created) as Mutual Giving Life (SangSaeng), and the world of HuCheon (the state after the Heaven and Earth have been created) as Mutual Destruction (SangGeuk). society etc. are rather “modern” and should be examined from the point of view of social science. Besides, leaving the boundaries of “modern philosophy”, the concepts of “Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings”, viewing the universe as one organism etc. should be approached from the point of view of Post-Modernism.","PeriodicalId":115590,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25050/jdaos.2009.20.0.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Four Tenets of Daesoon thought are the Creative conjunction of the virtues of Eum and Yang, the Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings, the Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life and the Realization of the Dao in the world. This article compares the concepts of the “Creative conjunction of the virtues of Eum and Yang”, the “Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings” and the “Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life” with “EumYangDaeDaeRon”, “ShinMyonKiDeok”, the Theory of Mutual Giving Life / Mutual Destruction (SangSaeng/SangGeukRon) of the Book of Changes and analyzes their common and different points. The conclusion is that Daesoon thought and the philosophy of the Book of Changes share common fundamental standpoints. However, the Daesoon thought defines the world of SeonCheon (the state before the Heaven and Earth have been created) as Mutual Giving Life (SangSaeng), and the world of HuCheon (the state after the Heaven and Earth have been created) as Mutual Destruction (SangGeuk). society etc. are rather “modern” and should be examined from the point of view of social science. Besides, leaving the boundaries of “modern philosophy”, the concepts of “Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings”, viewing the universe as one organism etc. should be approached from the point of view of Post-Modernism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从《易经》的哲学来解释大宣思想
大宣思想的四大信条是阴与阳的创造结合,神与人的和谐结合,为所有生命的相互利益而解决冤屈,以及在世界上实现道。本文比较了《易经》中的“阴阳合德”、“神人和谐”、“解怨生互益”等概念与《易经》中的“阴阳大德论”、“信明基德论”、“互生互灭论”等概念的异同,分析了它们的共同点和不同点。结论是,大宣思想和《易经》哲学具有共同的基本立场。但是,大宣思想把“善天”(天地创造之前的状态)的世界定义为“相生”,把“虎天”(天地创造之后的状态)的世界定义为“相灭”。社会等是相当“现代”的,应该从社会科学的角度来考察。此外,离开“现代哲学”的界限,“神人合一”、“宇宙一体”等概念也应该从后现代主义的角度来看待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflecting on the Dilemma of Compulsory Spiritual Education in Public Education A Study on the Concept of ‘Loyalty and Filial Piety’ in the Taoist Scriptures The Educational Acceptance of Religion in Multicultural Society: Focused on Cooperative Religious Education A Study on Daesoon Jinrihoe’s Participation and Role in International Development Cooperations A Study on the Ontological Meaning of Life in The Canonical Scripture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1