Performing Authenticity “In Your Own Sweet Way”

Kelsey A. K. Klotz
{"title":"Performing Authenticity “In Your Own Sweet Way”","authors":"Kelsey A. K. Klotz","doi":"10.14713/jjs.v12i1.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(Opening paragraph): \" In a 2001 interview for a PBS documentary titled Rediscovering Dave Brubeck , jazz critic Ira Gitler volunteered that the songs “In Your Own Sweet Way” and “The Duke,” both Dave Brubeck originals, became jazz standards “when Miles Davis played them, that gave them the official stamp of approval.” When interviewer Hedrick Smith asked Gitler why Davis could give the songs a stamp approval that Brubeck himself could not, Gitler responded, “Well because Miles Davis, in giving his stamp of approval to these Brubeck compositions by recording them, here was a black jazz man who was respected in both the black and white circles, and when he did it black people had to say, you know, ‘that’s cool.’” Put simply, Davis’s versions were “cool”—were somehow authentic —while Brubeck’s versions were not, despite being considered by most critics and audiences to be part of the cool jazz genre. In distinguishing between these uses of the term “cool,” Gitler rooted Davis’s authenticity and jazz authority in his blackness, implying that Brubeck’s whiteness kept him from achieving the same status.","PeriodicalId":331183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Jazz Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Jazz Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14713/jjs.v12i1.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

(Opening paragraph): " In a 2001 interview for a PBS documentary titled Rediscovering Dave Brubeck , jazz critic Ira Gitler volunteered that the songs “In Your Own Sweet Way” and “The Duke,” both Dave Brubeck originals, became jazz standards “when Miles Davis played them, that gave them the official stamp of approval.” When interviewer Hedrick Smith asked Gitler why Davis could give the songs a stamp approval that Brubeck himself could not, Gitler responded, “Well because Miles Davis, in giving his stamp of approval to these Brubeck compositions by recording them, here was a black jazz man who was respected in both the black and white circles, and when he did it black people had to say, you know, ‘that’s cool.’” Put simply, Davis’s versions were “cool”—were somehow authentic —while Brubeck’s versions were not, despite being considered by most critics and audiences to be part of the cool jazz genre. In distinguishing between these uses of the term “cool,” Gitler rooted Davis’s authenticity and jazz authority in his blackness, implying that Brubeck’s whiteness kept him from achieving the same status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“用你自己甜蜜的方式”表演真实
(开头一段):“2001年,在接受美国公共广播公司(PBS)纪录片《重新发现戴夫·布鲁贝克》(Rediscovering Dave Brubeck)采访时,爵士乐评论家艾拉·吉特勒(Ira Gitler)主动表示,《In Your Own Sweet Way》和《the Duke》这两首歌都是戴夫·布鲁贝克的原创作品,“当迈尔斯·戴维斯(Miles Davis)演奏它们时,它们就得到了官方的认可。”当采访者Hedrick Smith问吉特勒,为什么戴维斯可以给这些歌曲盖章,而布鲁贝克自己却不能,吉特勒回答说,“好吧,因为迈尔斯·戴维斯通过录制这些歌曲来给布鲁贝克的作品盖章,这是一个在黑人和白人圈子里都受到尊重的黑人爵士乐人,当他这样做的时候,黑人不得不说,你知道,‘太酷了。简而言之,戴维斯的版本是“酷”的——在某种程度上是真实的——而布鲁贝克的版本则不是,尽管大多数评论家和观众认为它是酷爵士流派的一部分。在区分“酷”一词的这些用法时,吉特勒将戴维斯的真实性和爵士乐的权威植根于他的黑人身份,暗示布鲁贝克的白人身份使他无法获得同样的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lonnie Liston Smith The Victoria Spivey Collection “Hard” or “Soft” Buddy Bolden’s Photo Thursday at Miller's
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1