Cost-oblivious storage reallocation

M. A. Bender, Martín Farach-Colton, S. Fekete, Jeremy T. Fineman, Seth Gilbert
{"title":"Cost-oblivious storage reallocation","authors":"M. A. Bender, Martín Farach-Colton, S. Fekete, Jeremy T. Fineman, Seth Gilbert","doi":"10.1145/2594538.2594548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Databases allocate and free blocks of storage on disk. Freed blocks introduce holes where no data is stored. Allocation systems attempt to reuse such deallocated regions in order to minimize the footprint on disk. When previously allocated blocks cannot be moved, this problem is called the memory allocation problem. It is known to have a logarithmic overhead in the footprint size. This paper defines the storage reallocation problem, where previously allocated blocks can be moved, or reallocated, but at some cost. This cost is determined by the allocation/reallocation cost function. The algorithms presented here are cost oblivious, in that they work for a broad and reasonable class of cost functions, even when they do not know what the cost function actually is. The objective is to minimize the storage footprint, that is, the largest memory address containing an allocated object, while simultaneously minimizing the reallocation costs. This paper gives asymptotically optimal algorithms for storage reallocation, in which the storage footprint is at most (1+ε) times optimal, and the reallocation cost is at most O((1/ε)log(1/ε)) times the original allocation cost, which is asymptotically optimal for constant ε. The algorithms are cost oblivious, which means they achieve these bounds with no knowledge of the allocation/reallocation cost function, as long as the cost function is subadditive.","PeriodicalId":302451,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 33rd ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 33rd ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2594538.2594548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Databases allocate and free blocks of storage on disk. Freed blocks introduce holes where no data is stored. Allocation systems attempt to reuse such deallocated regions in order to minimize the footprint on disk. When previously allocated blocks cannot be moved, this problem is called the memory allocation problem. It is known to have a logarithmic overhead in the footprint size. This paper defines the storage reallocation problem, where previously allocated blocks can be moved, or reallocated, but at some cost. This cost is determined by the allocation/reallocation cost function. The algorithms presented here are cost oblivious, in that they work for a broad and reasonable class of cost functions, even when they do not know what the cost function actually is. The objective is to minimize the storage footprint, that is, the largest memory address containing an allocated object, while simultaneously minimizing the reallocation costs. This paper gives asymptotically optimal algorithms for storage reallocation, in which the storage footprint is at most (1+ε) times optimal, and the reallocation cost is at most O((1/ε)log(1/ε)) times the original allocation cost, which is asymptotically optimal for constant ε. The algorithms are cost oblivious, which means they achieve these bounds with no knowledge of the allocation/reallocation cost function, as long as the cost function is subadditive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无关成本的存储重新分配
数据库分配和释放磁盘上的存储块。释放块引入了不存储数据的孔洞。分配系统试图重用这些已释放的区域,以尽量减少磁盘占用。当先前分配的块不能移动时,这个问题称为内存分配问题。众所周知,它在占用空间大小方面具有对数开销。本文定义了存储重新分配问题,其中先前分配的块可以移动或重新分配,但需要一定的成本。该成本由分配/再分配成本函数决定。这里介绍的算法是成本无关的,因为它们适用于广泛而合理的成本函数类,即使它们不知道成本函数实际上是什么。目标是最小化存储占用,即包含已分配对象的最大内存地址,同时最小化重新分配成本。本文给出了存储空间再分配的渐近最优算法,其中存储空间占用不超过(1+ε)倍最优,重新分配成本不超过O((1/ε)log(1/ε))倍原始分配成本,且对于常数ε是渐近最优的。这些算法是成本无关的,这意味着只要成本函数是次加性的,它们就可以在不知道分配/再分配成本函数的情况下实现这些界限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Session details: Classics Does query evaluation tractability help query containment? Session details: Web queries and big data On scale independence for querying big data Cleaning inconsistencies in information extraction via prioritized repairs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1