Development and Psychometric Analysis of Cyber Ethics Instrument (CEI)

Winfred Yaokumah
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Analysis of Cyber Ethics Instrument (CEI)","authors":"Winfred Yaokumah","doi":"10.4018/ijt.2021010104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study developed and validated the psychometric properties of a new instrument, cyber ethics instrument (CEI), for assessing cyber ethics. Items related to cyber ethics were generated from a review of both scholarly and practitioner literature for the development of the instrument. The instrument was administered to university students. A sample of 503 responses was used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to extract the factor structure. The results of EFA suggested a six-factor structure (cyber privacy, computer ethics, academic integrity, intellectual property, netiquette, cyber safety), explaining 67.7% of the total variance. The results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed acceptable model fit indices. Therefore, the results established the viability of CEI for measuring cyber ethics. The instrument is essential for advancing the field of cyber ethics research as it will serve as a tool educators and researchers can use to measure the current stage of cyber ethics. The results obtained from using CEI can help identify and recommend cyber ethics interventions.","PeriodicalId":287069,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Technoethics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Technoethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijt.2021010104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study developed and validated the psychometric properties of a new instrument, cyber ethics instrument (CEI), for assessing cyber ethics. Items related to cyber ethics were generated from a review of both scholarly and practitioner literature for the development of the instrument. The instrument was administered to university students. A sample of 503 responses was used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to extract the factor structure. The results of EFA suggested a six-factor structure (cyber privacy, computer ethics, academic integrity, intellectual property, netiquette, cyber safety), explaining 67.7% of the total variance. The results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed acceptable model fit indices. Therefore, the results established the viability of CEI for measuring cyber ethics. The instrument is essential for advancing the field of cyber ethics research as it will serve as a tool educators and researchers can use to measure the current stage of cyber ethics. The results obtained from using CEI can help identify and recommend cyber ethics interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络伦理量表(CEI)的开发与心理测量分析
本研究开发并验证了一种评估网络伦理的新工具——网络伦理工具(CEI)的心理测量特性。与网络伦理相关的项目来自于对该工具开发的学术和实践文献的回顾。这种仪器是给大学生使用的。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)提取503份回复样本的因子结构。EFA的结果显示了一个六因素结构(网络隐私、计算机道德、学术诚信、知识产权、网络礼仪、网络安全),解释了67.7%的总方差。验证性因子分析(CFA)结果显示模型拟合指标可接受。因此,研究结果确立了CEI衡量网络伦理的可行性。该工具对于推进网络伦理研究领域至关重要,因为它将作为教育工作者和研究人员可以用来衡量当前网络伦理阶段的工具。使用CEI获得的结果可以帮助识别和推荐网络伦理干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The State of Ethical AI in Practice: A Multiple Case Study of Estonian Public Service Organizations The Legitimacy of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Decision Making: Chinese Experience The Fairness Impact Assessment: Conceptualizing Problems of Fairness in Technological Design Operationalizing the Ethics of Connected and Automated Vehicles: An Engineering Perspective Analysis of Production Line Project Based on Value Sensitive Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1