Glycated hemoglobin as a predictive factor for postoperative outcome in controlled versus uncontrolled diabetic patients with ankle fractures

A. Zakaria, A. Hussein, Mahmoud Abouzied
{"title":"Glycated hemoglobin as a predictive factor for postoperative outcome in controlled versus uncontrolled diabetic patients with ankle fractures","authors":"A. Zakaria, A. Hussein, Mahmoud Abouzied","doi":"10.4103/eoj.eoj_18_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Ankle fracture in diabetic patients is a challenging condition owing to the inherent risk of complications with either operative or nonoperative treatment. However, operative treatment is considered the gold standard treatment for such cases. In this study, the hypothesis is that the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) could have a predictive value for postoperative outcomes and complications. Patients and methods A total of 34 diabetic patients with ankle fractures were included in this study. The patients are divided into two groups: the first group included patients with controlled diabetes (HbA1c<7) and the second group included patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c≥7). All patients were treated by standard open reduction and internal fixation. Results The complications rate was higher in the uncontrolled diabetes group (63.2%) than in the controlled diabetes group (26.6%). Preoperative HbA1c was higher in complicated patients than in uncomplicated patients (P=0.033), and postoperative HbA1c was also higher in complicated patients than in uncomplicated patients (P=0.031). The postoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was significantly higher in the controlled diabetes group than in the uncontrolled diabetes group (P=0.046). Conclusion The overall rate of complications was higher in the uncontrolled diabetes group (HbA1c≥7) than in the controlled diabetes group (HbA1c<7), with a statistically significant difference. These complications were mainly related to wound healing. Despite being statistically insignificant, poor radiological outcome was more common in the uncontrolled diabetes group. According to the postoperative AOFAS score, clinical outcome was more superior in the controlled diabetes group than in the uncontrolled diabetes group.","PeriodicalId":171084,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/eoj.eoj_18_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Ankle fracture in diabetic patients is a challenging condition owing to the inherent risk of complications with either operative or nonoperative treatment. However, operative treatment is considered the gold standard treatment for such cases. In this study, the hypothesis is that the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) could have a predictive value for postoperative outcomes and complications. Patients and methods A total of 34 diabetic patients with ankle fractures were included in this study. The patients are divided into two groups: the first group included patients with controlled diabetes (HbA1c<7) and the second group included patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c≥7). All patients were treated by standard open reduction and internal fixation. Results The complications rate was higher in the uncontrolled diabetes group (63.2%) than in the controlled diabetes group (26.6%). Preoperative HbA1c was higher in complicated patients than in uncomplicated patients (P=0.033), and postoperative HbA1c was also higher in complicated patients than in uncomplicated patients (P=0.031). The postoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was significantly higher in the controlled diabetes group than in the uncontrolled diabetes group (P=0.046). Conclusion The overall rate of complications was higher in the uncontrolled diabetes group (HbA1c≥7) than in the controlled diabetes group (HbA1c<7), with a statistically significant difference. These complications were mainly related to wound healing. Despite being statistically insignificant, poor radiological outcome was more common in the uncontrolled diabetes group. According to the postoperative AOFAS score, clinical outcome was more superior in the controlled diabetes group than in the uncontrolled diabetes group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖化血红蛋白作为控制与不控制糖尿病患者踝关节骨折术后预后的预测因素
背景糖尿病患者踝关节骨折是一个具有挑战性的疾病,无论是手术治疗还是非手术治疗,都存在并发症的固有风险。然而,手术治疗被认为是这类病例的金标准治疗。在本研究中,假设糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)对术后结局和并发症具有预测价值。患者与方法本研究共纳入34例糖尿病踝关节骨折患者。患者分为两组,第一组为控制糖尿病患者(HbA1c<7),第二组为未控制糖尿病患者(HbA1c≥7)。所有患者均行标准切开复位内固定。结果糖尿病未控制组的并发症发生率(63.2%)高于糖尿病控制组(26.6%)。并发症患者术前HbA1c高于无并发症患者(P=0.033),术后HbA1c高于无并发症患者(P=0.031)。糖尿病控制组术后美国骨科足踝学会(American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society, AOFAS)评分显著高于糖尿病未控制组(P=0.046)。结论糖尿病未控制组(HbA1c≥7)总并发症发生率高于糖尿病控制组(HbA1c<7),差异有统计学意义。这些并发症主要与伤口愈合有关。尽管统计学上不显著,但不良的放射学结果在未控制的糖尿病组中更为常见。根据术后AOFAS评分,糖尿病控制组临床结局优于糖尿病未控制组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are olecranon osteotomies preferred to triceps-elevating approaches in intraarticular distal humerus fractures? A literature review Comparative study of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by strut laminar autograft versus cage in degenerative lumbar spine diseases Distal fibula locked plate versus nonlocked plate for treatment of Danis Weber type B fracture comparative prospective study Assessment of lateral malleolus weber C fractures’ outcomes in patients undergoing syndesmosis-only fixation versus syndesmosis and fibular fixation Anterior odontoid lag screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1