An Empirical Comparison of Pen Pressure and Pen Tilt Input Techniques

Xiaolei Zhou, Xiangshi Ren, Yue Hui
{"title":"An Empirical Comparison of Pen Pressure and Pen Tilt Input Techniques","authors":"Xiaolei Zhou, Xiangshi Ren, Yue Hui","doi":"10.1109/ISPA.2008.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three experiments were conducted in this study to investigate the human ability to control pen pressure and pen tilt input, coupling cursor position, angle and scale respectively. Comparisons between pressure input and tilt input have been made in the three experiments. Experimental results show that decreasing pressure input resulted in very bad performance and was not a good input technique for any of the three experiments. In \"experiment1-coupling to cursor position\", the tilt input technique performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input technique, even though the tilt technique had a slightly higher error rate. In \"experiment2-coupling to cursor angle\", the tilt input performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input in terms of time. In \"experiment3-coupling to cursor scale\", tilt input performed a little better than increasing pressure input in terms of adjustment time, but a little worse in terms of the degree of control that users exerted. These results will be useful for further user interface design.","PeriodicalId":345341,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPA.2008.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted in this study to investigate the human ability to control pen pressure and pen tilt input, coupling cursor position, angle and scale respectively. Comparisons between pressure input and tilt input have been made in the three experiments. Experimental results show that decreasing pressure input resulted in very bad performance and was not a good input technique for any of the three experiments. In "experiment1-coupling to cursor position", the tilt input technique performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input technique, even though the tilt technique had a slightly higher error rate. In "experiment2-coupling to cursor angle", the tilt input performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input in terms of time. In "experiment3-coupling to cursor scale", tilt input performed a little better than increasing pressure input in terms of adjustment time, but a little worse in terms of the degree of control that users exerted. These results will be useful for further user interface design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
笔压力和笔倾斜输入技术的经验比较
本研究进行了三个实验,分别研究了人类控制笔压力和笔倾斜输入、耦合光标位置、角度和比例的能力。在三个实验中对压力输入和倾斜输入进行了比较。实验结果表明,减小压力输入导致性能很差,在三个实验中都不是一种好的输入技术。在“实验1-光标位置耦合”中,倾斜输入技术的表现相对优于加压输入技术,尽管倾斜输入技术的错误率略高。在“实验2-光标角度耦合”中,倾斜输入在时间上的表现相对好于递增压力输入。在“experiment3-coupling to cursor scale”中,倾斜输入在调整时间上略好于增加压力输入,但在用户的控制程度上略差。这些结果将对进一步的用户界面设计有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Image Feature Vector Construction Using Interest Point Based Regions A Fully Dynamic Distributed Algorithm for a B-Coloring of Graphs Fixed Point Decimal Multiplication Using RPS Algorithm Self-Stabilizing Construction of Bounded Size Clusters ScatterClipse: A Model-Driven Tool-Chain for Developing, Testing, and Prototyping Wireless Sensor Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1