Theatre as a Public Service. Tendencies and Relevance

G. Costin
{"title":"Theatre as a Public Service. Tendencies and Relevance","authors":"G. Costin","doi":"10.35218/tco.2022.12.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is an analysis of recent studies of non-governmental organizations (World Economic Forum) which have generated cultural strategies and which are today influencing the relationship between the society and the forms that organize and finance culture. The article also analyses the way in which the cultural strategies generated by these studies are manifesting themselves in the theatrical landscape in Romania: the polarization of the theatrical speech, the standardization of the means of expressing messages on the stage and the offensive brought by the non-governmental organizations. Starting from the context aforementioned, we need a research regarding the way ideological trends are influencing the way we represent things on the stage and are modifying the axiology of the theatre. I’m talking about notions that are necessary to establish a frame and some standards of evaluation regarding the theatrical domain: competence and relevance. How are they defined? How and who can measure them? It is also of utter importance to analyze the terms and notions that are used in the recent and most acid critic reviews of the theatre productions in Romania: independent theatre, state financed theatre, gigantic productions, alternative spaces, the under-financing of the cultural sector, management, cultural management experts, etc. Last but not least, the article mentions the way in which some of the most influent characters involved in the theatre world of the 20th century have looked to what is the problematics of researching the theatrical act: Ariane Mnouchkine and Peter Brook. Is there innovation in a multi-millennial art? Is theatre something else than an art of the present which is serving the city? We are crossing a period of time in which, also due to the restrictions generated by the pandemics, it was debated in the public space (and the authorities have encouraged that idea) to move the theatre in the on line. Starting from the premise that the theatre without an audience stops being theatre, I will analyze, in the context described earlier, the relationship between theatre and the new trends in the Euro-Atlantic culture: progressivism and digitalization.","PeriodicalId":326041,"journal":{"name":"Theatrical Colloquia","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theatrical Colloquia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35218/tco.2022.12.1.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article is an analysis of recent studies of non-governmental organizations (World Economic Forum) which have generated cultural strategies and which are today influencing the relationship between the society and the forms that organize and finance culture. The article also analyses the way in which the cultural strategies generated by these studies are manifesting themselves in the theatrical landscape in Romania: the polarization of the theatrical speech, the standardization of the means of expressing messages on the stage and the offensive brought by the non-governmental organizations. Starting from the context aforementioned, we need a research regarding the way ideological trends are influencing the way we represent things on the stage and are modifying the axiology of the theatre. I’m talking about notions that are necessary to establish a frame and some standards of evaluation regarding the theatrical domain: competence and relevance. How are they defined? How and who can measure them? It is also of utter importance to analyze the terms and notions that are used in the recent and most acid critic reviews of the theatre productions in Romania: independent theatre, state financed theatre, gigantic productions, alternative spaces, the under-financing of the cultural sector, management, cultural management experts, etc. Last but not least, the article mentions the way in which some of the most influent characters involved in the theatre world of the 20th century have looked to what is the problematics of researching the theatrical act: Ariane Mnouchkine and Peter Brook. Is there innovation in a multi-millennial art? Is theatre something else than an art of the present which is serving the city? We are crossing a period of time in which, also due to the restrictions generated by the pandemics, it was debated in the public space (and the authorities have encouraged that idea) to move the theatre in the on line. Starting from the premise that the theatre without an audience stops being theatre, I will analyze, in the context described earlier, the relationship between theatre and the new trends in the Euro-Atlantic culture: progressivism and digitalization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戏剧作为一种公共服务。趋势和相关性
这篇文章是对非政府组织(世界经济论坛)最近的研究的分析,这些研究产生了文化战略,今天正在影响社会与组织和资助文化的形式之间的关系。本文还分析了这些研究产生的文化策略在罗马尼亚戏剧景观中的表现方式:戏剧演讲的两极分化,舞台上表达信息的手段的标准化以及非政府组织带来的攻势。从上述背景出发,我们需要研究意识形态趋势如何影响我们在舞台上表现事物的方式,并正在修改戏剧的价值论。我说的是建立戏剧领域的框架和一些评价标准所必需的概念:能力和相关性。它们是如何定义的?如何以及由谁来衡量它们?分析最近对罗马尼亚戏剧作品的最尖锐的评论中使用的术语和概念也非常重要:独立剧院、国家资助的剧院、大型作品、替代空间、文化部门资金不足、管理、文化管理专家等。最后但并非最不重要的是,这篇文章提到了20世纪戏剧界最有影响力的一些人物是如何看待研究戏剧行为的问题的:阿丽亚娜·姆努奇金和彼得·布鲁克。千年艺术有创新吗?戏剧是一种服务于城市的当代艺术吗?我们正在经历一段时期,在这段时期,同样由于大流行病造成的限制,人们在公共场所讨论(当局鼓励这种想法)将剧院移到网上。从没有观众的剧院不再是剧院这一前提出发,我将在前面描述的背景下分析戏剧与欧洲-大西洋文化的新趋势:进步主义和数字化之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Metaphor and Theatre Lessons Regarding Liberty The stage of the radio theater - new metaphorical space Stage Lighting In Puppetry, A Friend Or An Enemy ? Dance film from Maya Deren to Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1