Invited Paper: Local Differential Privacy on Metric Spaces: Optimizing the Trade-Off with Utility

M. Alvim, K. Chatzikokolakis, C. Palamidessi, A. Pazii
{"title":"Invited Paper: Local Differential Privacy on Metric Spaces: Optimizing the Trade-Off with Utility","authors":"M. Alvim, K. Chatzikokolakis, C. Palamidessi, A. Pazii","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2018.00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Local differential privacy (LPD) is a distributed variant of differential privacy (DP) in which the obfuscation of the sensitive information is done at the level of the individual records, and in general it is used to sanitize data that are collected for statistical purposes. LPD has the advantage it does not need to assume a trusted third party. On the other hand LDP in general requires more noise than DP to achieve the same level of protection, with negative consequences on the utility. In practice, utility becomes acceptable only on very large collections of data, and this is the reason why LDP is especially successful among big companies such as Apple and Google, which can count on a huge number of users. In this talk, we propose a variant of LDP suitable for metric spaces, such as location data or energy consumption data, and we show that it provides a much higher utility for the same level of privacy. Furthermore, we discuss algorithms to extract the best possible statistical information from the data obfuscated with this metric variant of LDP.","PeriodicalId":417032,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 31st Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","volume":"57 6 Suppl 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 31st Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2018.00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Local differential privacy (LPD) is a distributed variant of differential privacy (DP) in which the obfuscation of the sensitive information is done at the level of the individual records, and in general it is used to sanitize data that are collected for statistical purposes. LPD has the advantage it does not need to assume a trusted third party. On the other hand LDP in general requires more noise than DP to achieve the same level of protection, with negative consequences on the utility. In practice, utility becomes acceptable only on very large collections of data, and this is the reason why LDP is especially successful among big companies such as Apple and Google, which can count on a huge number of users. In this talk, we propose a variant of LDP suitable for metric spaces, such as location data or energy consumption data, and we show that it provides a much higher utility for the same level of privacy. Furthermore, we discuss algorithms to extract the best possible statistical information from the data obfuscated with this metric variant of LDP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
邀请论文:度量空间上的局部微分隐私:与效用权衡的优化
本地差异隐私(LPD)是差异隐私(DP)的一种分布式变体,其中敏感信息的混淆是在单个记录级别上完成的,通常用于清理为统计目的收集的数据。LPD的优势在于它不需要信任第三方。另一方面,为了达到同样的保护水平,LDP通常需要比DP更多的噪音,这对效用有负面影响。在实践中,实用性只有在非常大的数据集合上才被接受,这就是为什么LDP在像苹果和谷歌这样的大公司中特别成功的原因,因为它们可以依靠大量的用户。在这次演讲中,我们提出了一种适合度量空间的LDP变体,例如位置数据或能耗数据,并且我们表明它为相同级别的隐私提供了更高的效用。此外,我们还讨论了从被LDP的度量变量混淆的数据中提取最佳统计信息的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Title Page i Alethea: A Provably Secure Random Sample Voting Protocol Assuming You Know: Epistemic Semantics of Relational Annotations for Expressive Flow Policies Invited Paper: Secure Boot and Remote Attestation in the Sanctum Processor Symbolic Security of Garbled Circuits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1