An extended-shadow-code based approach for off-line signature verification. II. Evaluation of several multi-classifier combination strategies

R. Sabourin, Ginette Genest
{"title":"An extended-shadow-code based approach for off-line signature verification. II. Evaluation of several multi-classifier combination strategies","authors":"R. Sabourin, Ginette Genest","doi":"10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For pt.I see Proc. 12th ICPR, p.450-3. In a real situation, the choice of the best representation R(/spl gamma/) for the implementation of a signature verification system able to cope with all types of handwriting is a very difficult task. This study is original in that the design of the integrated classifiers E(x) is based on a large number of individual classifiers e/sub k/(x) (or signature representations R(/spl gamma/)) in an attempt to overcome in some way the need for feature selection. In this paper, the authors present a first systematical evaluation of a multi-classifier-based approach for off-line signature verification. Two types of integrated classifiers based on kNN or minimum distance classifiers and 15 types of representation related to the ESC used as a shape factor have been evaluated using a signature database of 800 images (20 writers/spl times/40 signatures per writer) in the context of random forgeries.","PeriodicalId":273519,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition","volume":"392 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

For pt.I see Proc. 12th ICPR, p.450-3. In a real situation, the choice of the best representation R(/spl gamma/) for the implementation of a signature verification system able to cope with all types of handwriting is a very difficult task. This study is original in that the design of the integrated classifiers E(x) is based on a large number of individual classifiers e/sub k/(x) (or signature representations R(/spl gamma/)) in an attempt to overcome in some way the need for feature selection. In this paper, the authors present a first systematical evaluation of a multi-classifier-based approach for off-line signature verification. Two types of integrated classifiers based on kNN or minimum distance classifiers and 15 types of representation related to the ESC used as a shape factor have been evaluated using a signature database of 800 images (20 writers/spl times/40 signatures per writer) in the context of random forgeries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种基于扩展阴影码的离线签名验证方法。2几种多分类器组合策略的评价
关于p.i,见第12届公民权利公约程序,第450-3页。在实际情况中,为实现能够处理所有类型笔迹的签名验证系统选择最佳表示R(/spl gamma/)是一项非常困难的任务。本研究的独创性在于,集成分类器E(x)的设计基于大量的单个分类器E /sub k/(x)(或签名表示R(/spl gamma/)),试图以某种方式克服特征选择的需要。在本文中,作者首次系统地评估了一种基于多分类器的离线签名验证方法。基于kNN或最小距离分类器的两种类型的集成分类器和15种与ESC相关的表示类型作为形状因子,已经在随机伪造的背景下使用800个图像的签名数据库(20个作家/spl次/每个作家40个签名)进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detection of courtesy amount block on bank checks Visual inter-word relations and their use in OCR postprocessing Interactive acquisition of thematic information of Chinese verbs for judicial verdict document understanding using templates, syntactic clues, and heuristics Knowledge-based derivation of document logical structure Evaluation of an interactive tool for handwritten form description
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1