Tort Liability and the Market for Prescription Drugs

Eric A. Helland, D. Lakdawalla, S. Seabury, A. Malani
{"title":"Tort Liability and the Market for Prescription Drugs","authors":"Eric A. Helland, D. Lakdawalla, S. Seabury, A. Malani","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1641239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nearly all the empirical literature on tort liability in the healthcare sector focuses on physicians. Yet both drug companies and physicians lose roughly the same portion of revenue (2 percent) to liability expenses.Moreover, the health care system’s expenditures on drugs are rising nearly twice as fast as expenditures on physician and hospital care. In this paper we model and estimate the welfare effects of failure‐to‐warn suits, the most common type of tort litigation involving drug companies. We find that tort liability ‐‐ proxied by punitive damage caps ‐‐ increases drug prices but that it also reduces side effects. Moreover, we find that tort liability increases the equilibrium quantity of drug sales. This suggests that liability not only increases cost and reduces supply, but also increases expected safety and thus demand. Together the increase in equilibrium quantity and reduction in side effects suggests that tort liability improves social welfare.","PeriodicalId":230649,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1641239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Nearly all the empirical literature on tort liability in the healthcare sector focuses on physicians. Yet both drug companies and physicians lose roughly the same portion of revenue (2 percent) to liability expenses.Moreover, the health care system’s expenditures on drugs are rising nearly twice as fast as expenditures on physician and hospital care. In this paper we model and estimate the welfare effects of failure‐to‐warn suits, the most common type of tort litigation involving drug companies. We find that tort liability ‐‐ proxied by punitive damage caps ‐‐ increases drug prices but that it also reduces side effects. Moreover, we find that tort liability increases the equilibrium quantity of drug sales. This suggests that liability not only increases cost and reduces supply, but also increases expected safety and thus demand. Together the increase in equilibrium quantity and reduction in side effects suggests that tort liability improves social welfare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侵权责任与处方药市场
几乎所有关于医疗保健部门侵权责任的实证文献都集中在医生身上。然而,制药公司和医生因责任费用而损失的收入比例大致相同(2%)。此外,医疗保健系统的药品支出增长速度几乎是医生和医院护理支出的两倍。在本文中,我们建立模型并估计了未预警诉讼的福利效应,这是涉及制药公司的最常见的侵权诉讼类型。我们发现,由惩罚性损害赔偿上限所代表的侵权责任增加了药品价格,但也减少了副作用。此外,我们发现侵权责任增加了药品销售的均衡数量。这表明,责任不仅增加了成本,减少了供应,而且增加了预期安全性,从而增加了需求。均衡数量的增加和副作用的减少共同表明,侵权责任改善了社会福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Law in End-of-Life Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients, Substitute Decision-Makers and Families Phasing Out Certificate-of-Need Laws: A Menu of Options Prospect Patents, Data Markets and the Commons in Data Driven Medicine. Openness and the Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights Grandma Got Run Over by the Doctor: An Examination of the End of Life Choice Bill with Reference to the German Approach Credit, Default, and Optimal Health Insurance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1