The Mechanical Response of Concentric Cemented Casings Exposed to Arbitrary Transverse External Geomechanical and Salt Loads

U. B. Sathuvalli, S. Krishna, P. Suryanarayana
{"title":"The Mechanical Response of Concentric Cemented Casings Exposed to Arbitrary Transverse External Geomechanical and Salt Loads","authors":"U. B. Sathuvalli, S. Krishna, P. Suryanarayana","doi":"10.2118/194121-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n When wellbores are exposed to loads of geomechanical origin, the outer casings can become vulnerable to the transverse load components. These loads are usually non-uniform in character (Veeken et al. 1994). The collapse resistance of tubulars to non-uniform loads is substantially lower than their resistance to uniform loads. In the face of such reduced tubular strength, the well engineer uses thick walled high strength casings or a system of concentric cemented casings (Clegg 1971; Pattillo and Rankin 1981; Pattillo et al. 1995). In either case, the designer has to determine a quantitative measure of well integrity i.e., a safety factor (SF) of the casing for the non-uniform loading. In our industry, well designers have used finite element analyses (FEA) to assess the mechanical response of the casings subjected to such loads (Pattillo et al. 1995; Li et al. 2003).\n The simplest stress analysis problem in such situations consists of at least three cylinders, the innermost casing, the cement sheath and the formation up to the farfield boundary. Depending on the numerical methods employed in the geomechanical analysis, the farfield geomechanical loads are presented as displacements or tractions. In this paper, we present an analytical procedure to determine the mechanical response of a system of nested concentric cylinders exposed to an arbitrary traction or displacement on the outer radius of the outermost cylinder. We use the solution to quantify the effect of the loads on the concentric casings and the intervening cement sheaths, and to assess the effect of the formation. To this end we use well-known methods employed in the theory of elasticity to derive our solution. The analytical solution presented in the mathematical appendices can be implemented in a programmable spreadsheet.","PeriodicalId":441797,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 06, 2019","volume":"52 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194121-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

When wellbores are exposed to loads of geomechanical origin, the outer casings can become vulnerable to the transverse load components. These loads are usually non-uniform in character (Veeken et al. 1994). The collapse resistance of tubulars to non-uniform loads is substantially lower than their resistance to uniform loads. In the face of such reduced tubular strength, the well engineer uses thick walled high strength casings or a system of concentric cemented casings (Clegg 1971; Pattillo and Rankin 1981; Pattillo et al. 1995). In either case, the designer has to determine a quantitative measure of well integrity i.e., a safety factor (SF) of the casing for the non-uniform loading. In our industry, well designers have used finite element analyses (FEA) to assess the mechanical response of the casings subjected to such loads (Pattillo et al. 1995; Li et al. 2003). The simplest stress analysis problem in such situations consists of at least three cylinders, the innermost casing, the cement sheath and the formation up to the farfield boundary. Depending on the numerical methods employed in the geomechanical analysis, the farfield geomechanical loads are presented as displacements or tractions. In this paper, we present an analytical procedure to determine the mechanical response of a system of nested concentric cylinders exposed to an arbitrary traction or displacement on the outer radius of the outermost cylinder. We use the solution to quantify the effect of the loads on the concentric casings and the intervening cement sheaths, and to assess the effect of the formation. To this end we use well-known methods employed in the theory of elasticity to derive our solution. The analytical solution presented in the mathematical appendices can be implemented in a programmable spreadsheet.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同心胶结套管在任意横向外地质力学和盐荷载作用下的力学响应
当井筒暴露在地质力学载荷下时,外部套管可能会受到横向载荷分量的影响。这些载荷在性质上通常是不均匀的(Veeken et al. 1994)。钢管在非均布荷载作用下的抗溃性明显低于其在均布荷载作用下的抗溃性。面对这种套管强度的降低,井工程师使用厚壁高强度套管或同心胶结套管系统(Clegg 1971;Pattillo and Rankin 1981;Pattillo et al. 1995)。无论哪种情况,设计人员都必须确定井完整性的定量指标,即套管在非均匀载荷下的安全系数(SF)。在我们的行业中,油井设计人员已经使用有限元分析(FEA)来评估套管在这种载荷下的机械响应(Pattillo et al. 1995;Li et al. 2003)。在这种情况下,最简单的应力分析问题包括至少三个柱体、最内层的套管、水泥环和远场边界的地层。根据在地质力学分析中采用的数值方法,远场地质力学荷载被表示为位移或牵引力。在本文中,我们提出了一种分析方法来确定一个嵌套同心圆柱体系统在最外层圆柱体的外半径上受到任意牵引或位移时的力学响应。我们使用该解决方案来量化载荷对同心套管和中间水泥环的影响,并评估地层的影响。为此,我们使用弹性理论中常用的方法来推导我们的解。数学附录中给出的解析解可以在可编程电子表格中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Drill Bit and Drilling Motor with Embedded High-Frequency 1600Hz Drilling Dynamics Sensors Provide New Insights into Challenging Downhole Drilling Conditions Evaluation of the Elevated Temperature Performance and Degradation Mechanisms of Thread Compounds Dynamic Stress Analysis of Critical and Cyclic Loads for Production Casing in Horizontal Shale Wells Combined Gyroscopic and Magnetic Surveys Provide Improved Magnetic Survey Data and Enhanced Survey Quality Control Intelligent Wellbore Path Estimation Using Multiple Integrated MEMS Sensors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1