Har utmarka blitt historie?

Knut Fageraas
{"title":"Har utmarka blitt historie?","authors":"Knut Fageraas","doi":"10.23865/noasp.151.ch10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past hundred years we have seen a wide-ranging agricultural land abandonment process and land-use transformation with respect to the outfields of rural areas. In addition, large outfield areas have been protected as nature reserves and national parks, concealing their cultural legacy. Despite a shift in the landscape’s status and its diminished importance to rural livelihoods, we have witnessed a broadened interest in the cultural heritage of outlying fields. This is apparent not least in the fact that the historical remains and cultural landscape of outfield areas have come to the forefront of national cultural heritage policy, are targets for tourism initiatives, and have been at the core of local identity struggles. This chapter takes as its point of departure the growing field of heritage politics in present day society through a focus on the many actors’ engagement with different aspects of the past in relation to landscape characteristics and historical remains in outfield areas. The aim is to provide insight into ways the past is managed and engaged in certain political, economic and social contexts, as a background to reflect on diverse aspects of cultural heritage, social justice related to its management, and its value for local communities. Cultural heritage policy and practices contribute to the varying uses of outfield areas, affecting ways people perceive the landscape, dwell within it, and – despite the potential for conflict of interest – see future opportunities.","PeriodicalId":273764,"journal":{"name":"Utmark i endring","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utmark i endring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.151.ch10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past hundred years we have seen a wide-ranging agricultural land abandonment process and land-use transformation with respect to the outfields of rural areas. In addition, large outfield areas have been protected as nature reserves and national parks, concealing their cultural legacy. Despite a shift in the landscape’s status and its diminished importance to rural livelihoods, we have witnessed a broadened interest in the cultural heritage of outlying fields. This is apparent not least in the fact that the historical remains and cultural landscape of outfield areas have come to the forefront of national cultural heritage policy, are targets for tourism initiatives, and have been at the core of local identity struggles. This chapter takes as its point of departure the growing field of heritage politics in present day society through a focus on the many actors’ engagement with different aspects of the past in relation to landscape characteristics and historical remains in outfield areas. The aim is to provide insight into ways the past is managed and engaged in certain political, economic and social contexts, as a background to reflect on diverse aspects of cultural heritage, social justice related to its management, and its value for local communities. Cultural heritage policy and practices contribute to the varying uses of outfield areas, affecting ways people perceive the landscape, dwell within it, and – despite the potential for conflict of interest – see future opportunities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在过去的一百年里,我们看到了广泛的农业用地废弃过程和农村地区土地利用的转变。此外,大片的外场地区被保护为自然保护区和国家公园,隐藏了它们的文化遗产。尽管景观的地位发生了变化,对农村生计的重要性也有所下降,但我们看到人们对边远地区文化遗产的兴趣越来越大。这一点很明显,尤其是外场地区的历史遗迹和文化景观已经成为国家文化遗产政策的前沿,成为旅游倡议的目标,并且一直是当地身份斗争的核心。本章以当今社会日益增长的遗产政治领域为出发点,重点关注许多参与者与过去不同方面的接触,这些方面与景观特征和外场地区的历史遗迹有关。其目的是提供对过去的管理方式的见解,并在某些政治、经济和社会背景下参与,作为反思文化遗产的各个方面的背景,与管理相关的社会正义,以及它对当地社区的价值。文化遗产政策和实践促进了外场的不同用途,影响了人们对景观的看法,居住在其中的方式,尽管存在潜在的利益冲突,但也看到了未来的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Menneske og dyr i grenseland – om rettar, rettferd og rett ferd i utmarka Mot ei framtid for utmarksbeite – om beiting, sjølvkjensle og forståing mellom folk Fritidsbygg i fjellområdet – en egen boligstruktur? Utmark i endring – når nye tider gir andre tilhøve Reindriftas sårbarhet og Norges ansvar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1