Metric for Evaluating Negotiation Process in Automated Negotiation

Xun Tang, Takayuki Ito
{"title":"Metric for Evaluating Negotiation Process in Automated Negotiation","authors":"Xun Tang, Takayuki Ito","doi":"10.1109/AGENTS.2018.8460127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the growing interest in automated negotiation, the search for effective strategies has produced a variety of different negotiation agents[8]. The Automated Negotiating Agents Competition(ANAC) has been annually held since 2010. The ANAC is an international competition that challenges researchers to design the agents that are able to operate effectively in different kinds of scenarios. In this competition, researchers analyze the negotiation agents from the aspects of utility, social welfare, distance to Nash solution, distance to Pareto and so on. Most of the analyses are based on negotiation results. Actually, the negotiation process can affect the negotiation results. To reach an agreement, agents analyze bids opponents have proposed and use a threshold function to decide how to compromise, this will determine the negotiation results. In this paper, we will describe a method called “negotiating efficiency” to evaluate the negotiation process. We will also explain how the process can affect the result.","PeriodicalId":248901,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Agents (ICA)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Agents (ICA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AGENTS.2018.8460127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Given the growing interest in automated negotiation, the search for effective strategies has produced a variety of different negotiation agents[8]. The Automated Negotiating Agents Competition(ANAC) has been annually held since 2010. The ANAC is an international competition that challenges researchers to design the agents that are able to operate effectively in different kinds of scenarios. In this competition, researchers analyze the negotiation agents from the aspects of utility, social welfare, distance to Nash solution, distance to Pareto and so on. Most of the analyses are based on negotiation results. Actually, the negotiation process can affect the negotiation results. To reach an agreement, agents analyze bids opponents have proposed and use a threshold function to decide how to compromise, this will determine the negotiation results. In this paper, we will describe a method called “negotiating efficiency” to evaluate the negotiation process. We will also explain how the process can affect the result.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动协商中协商过程评价指标
鉴于人们对自动谈判的兴趣日益浓厚,对有效策略的探索产生了各种不同的谈判代理[8]。自动谈判代理大赛(ANAC)自2010年起每年举办一次。ANAC是一项国际竞赛,挑战研究人员设计能够在不同场景下有效运行的代理。在本次竞赛中,研究者从效用、社会福利、到纳什解的距离、到帕累托的距离等方面对谈判主体进行了分析。大多数分析都是基于谈判结果。实际上,谈判过程会影响谈判结果。为了达成协议,代理人分析对手提出的出价,并使用阈值函数来决定如何妥协,这将决定谈判结果。在本文中,我们将描述一种称为“谈判效率”的方法来评估谈判过程。我们还将解释过程如何影响结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proceedings: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Agents (ICA) Identifying safety properties guaranteed in changed environment at runtime A Cyclical Social Learning Strategy for Robust Convention Emergence Copyright Efficient Task Allocation with Communication Delay Based on Reciprocal Teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1