Processing Fluency and Investors’ Reactions to Disclosure Readability

Kristina Rennekamp
{"title":"Processing Fluency and Investors’ Reactions to Disclosure Readability","authors":"Kristina Rennekamp","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1881847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SEC's emphasis on the use of plain English is designed to make disclosures more readable and more informative. Using an experiment, I find that more readable disclosures lead to stronger reactions from small investors, so that changes in valuation judgments are more positive when news is good and more negative when news is bad. Drawing on research in psychology to explain this result, I predict and find that processing fluency from a more readable disclosure acts as a subconscious heuristic cue and increases investors’ beliefs that they can rely on the disclosure. Although I do not find that more readable disclosures directly increase perceptions of management credibility, I do find evidence of an indirect effect operating through feelings of processing fluency. In supplemental analyses, I find that investors who receive more readable disclosures revise their valuation judgments to be less extreme when they are explicitly made aware of the potential for variation in readability. I discuss potential explanations for these revised valuation judgments.","PeriodicalId":365298,"journal":{"name":"CSN: Business (Topic)","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"375","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CSN: Business (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1881847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 375

Abstract

The SEC's emphasis on the use of plain English is designed to make disclosures more readable and more informative. Using an experiment, I find that more readable disclosures lead to stronger reactions from small investors, so that changes in valuation judgments are more positive when news is good and more negative when news is bad. Drawing on research in psychology to explain this result, I predict and find that processing fluency from a more readable disclosure acts as a subconscious heuristic cue and increases investors’ beliefs that they can rely on the disclosure. Although I do not find that more readable disclosures directly increase perceptions of management credibility, I do find evidence of an indirect effect operating through feelings of processing fluency. In supplemental analyses, I find that investors who receive more readable disclosures revise their valuation judgments to be less extreme when they are explicitly made aware of the potential for variation in readability. I discuss potential explanations for these revised valuation judgments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加工流畅性与投资者对信息披露可读性的反应
SEC强调使用简明的英语,是为了让披露的信息更具可读性和信息量。通过实验,我发现更可读的信息披露会导致小投资者的反应更强烈,所以当消息是好的时候,估值判断的变化更积极,当消息是坏的时候,估值判断的变化更消极。利用心理学研究来解释这一结果,我预测并发现,从更可读的信息披露中处理流畅性可以作为一种潜意识的启发式暗示,并增加投资者对信息披露可依赖的信念。虽然我没有发现更可读的信息披露直接增加了人们对管理可信度的看法,但我确实发现了通过处理流畅感产生间接影响的证据。在补充分析中,我发现收到可读性更高的披露的投资者在明确意识到可读性变化的可能性时,会修改他们的估值判断,使其不那么极端。我讨论了这些修正后的估值判断的潜在解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporal Reframing Elicitations Can Improve the Emergency Savings Intentions of Gig Workers Pharmaceutical Lottery Stocks: Investors’ Reaction to FDA Announcements Review Studies: Lifestyle and Social Class in Consumer Behavior for Services Industries Market Distraction and Near-Zero Volatility Persistence Do Preferences for Private Labels Respond to Supermarket Loyalty Programs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1