PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERUSAKAN SEPEDA MOTOR

Lukmanul Hakim, Okta Ainita, Justicia Tessalonika Panjaitan
{"title":"PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERUSAKAN SEPEDA MOTOR","authors":"Lukmanul Hakim, Okta Ainita, Justicia Tessalonika Panjaitan","doi":"10.53363/bureau.v2i1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The act of destruction of goods in this case is a motorcycle is one form of lawlessness, which is regulated in Article 406 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. The problem is how criminal accountability for the perpetrators of motorcycle destruction and how the judge's consideration in the enforcement of the verdict against the perpetrator of the motorcycle destruction crime. Data collection is based on literature studies and field studies, while data processing is done by editing methods, classification and systematization of data, then analyzed using qualitative analysis. The results of the study showed that criminal liability against the perpetrators of motorcycle destruction crimes has been proven legitimately and convinced guilty of committing criminal acts of destruction and criminally convicted defendants therefore with a prison sentence of 1 (one) year each and the basis of the judge's consideration in the enforcement of the verdict against the perpetrator of the crime of bicycle destruction, among others, evidence,  Witness statements, expert testimony, indictments and demands of the Public Prosecutor, elements that meet in the Prosecutor's Indictment, as well as incriminating and mitigating matters in the accused","PeriodicalId":345865,"journal":{"name":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The act of destruction of goods in this case is a motorcycle is one form of lawlessness, which is regulated in Article 406 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. The problem is how criminal accountability for the perpetrators of motorcycle destruction and how the judge's consideration in the enforcement of the verdict against the perpetrator of the motorcycle destruction crime. Data collection is based on literature studies and field studies, while data processing is done by editing methods, classification and systematization of data, then analyzed using qualitative analysis. The results of the study showed that criminal liability against the perpetrators of motorcycle destruction crimes has been proven legitimately and convinced guilty of committing criminal acts of destruction and criminally convicted defendants therefore with a prison sentence of 1 (one) year each and the basis of the judge's consideration in the enforcement of the verdict against the perpetrator of the crime of bicycle destruction, among others, evidence,  Witness statements, expert testimony, indictments and demands of the Public Prosecutor, elements that meet in the Prosecutor's Indictment, as well as incriminating and mitigating matters in the accused
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对破坏摩托车的罪犯的责任
在这种情况下,破坏货物的行为是摩托车是一种违法行为,这是刑法第406条第(1)款规定的。问题是如何追究破坏摩托车犯罪行为人的刑事责任,以及法官在执行对破坏摩托车犯罪行为人的判决时应如何考虑。数据的收集是基于文献研究和实地调查,而数据的处理是通过数据的编辑方法,分类和系统化,然后使用定性分析进行分析。研究结果表明,毁坏摩托车犯罪的肇事者的刑事责任已被合法证明,并被确信犯有破坏犯罪行为,被告被刑事定罪,因此被判处1年徒刑,法官在执行对毁坏自行车犯罪的肇事者的判决时考虑的基础,除其他外,证据,证人陈述,专家证词,检察官的起诉书和要求,检察官起诉书中符合的要素,以及被告的定罪和减刑事项
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MELARIKAN WANITA YANG BELUM CUKUP UMUR PUTUSAN /36/Pid.B/2019 PN GST TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK BERDASARKAN PASAL 310 KUHP ANALISIS HUKUM KEBIJAKAN KELEBIHAN DIMENSI DAN KELEBIHAN MUATAN TERHADAP DEMONSTRAN GERAKAN SOPIR JAWA TIMUR ANALISIS HUKUM KONTEN NEGATIF DI PLATFORM YOUTUBE DI INDONESIA KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA E-LITIGASI BERLANDASKAN NILAI KEADILAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1