Impediments to an Active African Intelligentsia in Championing the Africanisation Agenda

B. Mngomezulu
{"title":"Impediments to an Active African Intelligentsia in Championing the Africanisation Agenda","authors":"B. Mngomezulu","doi":"10.1080/18186874.2020.1743731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Africanisation in its different facets has been a recurring theme in African politics. Africa has invoked this theme at different historical moments, albeit in varying magnitudes. The theme became popular in the 1960s and 1970s, when various African countries won their independence. The political and academic leadership found a point of convergence as they participated in the ensuing debates on how the Africanisation project would be carried out. Following the decision by the African Union to find “African solutions to African problems”, and in the aftermath of the #FeesMustFall movement in South Africa, there has been a resurgence of the debate on the Africanisation of the curriculum. With a few exceptions, despite all these developments, the African intelligentsia seems to have been slow in championing the Africanisation project. This article looks at some of the impediments which the current African intelligentsia has to contend with. Drawing from distant and recent history, the article traces some causal factors of these impediments. These are discussed from a general theoretical perspective and by citing specific cases. One conclusion is that the African intelligentsia is not as active as it should be. The recommendation is that it should become more active and visible in order to earn respect and recognition.","PeriodicalId":256939,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2020.1743731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Africanisation in its different facets has been a recurring theme in African politics. Africa has invoked this theme at different historical moments, albeit in varying magnitudes. The theme became popular in the 1960s and 1970s, when various African countries won their independence. The political and academic leadership found a point of convergence as they participated in the ensuing debates on how the Africanisation project would be carried out. Following the decision by the African Union to find “African solutions to African problems”, and in the aftermath of the #FeesMustFall movement in South Africa, there has been a resurgence of the debate on the Africanisation of the curriculum. With a few exceptions, despite all these developments, the African intelligentsia seems to have been slow in championing the Africanisation project. This article looks at some of the impediments which the current African intelligentsia has to contend with. Drawing from distant and recent history, the article traces some causal factors of these impediments. These are discussed from a general theoretical perspective and by citing specific cases. One conclusion is that the African intelligentsia is not as active as it should be. The recommendation is that it should become more active and visible in order to earn respect and recognition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲知识分子积极倡导非洲化议程的障碍
抽象的非洲化在不同的方面一直是非洲政治中反复出现的主题。非洲在不同的历史时刻援引了这一主题,尽管程度不同。这个主题在20世纪60年代和70年代流行起来,当时许多非洲国家赢得了独立。政治和学术领导在随后的关于如何实施非洲化项目的辩论中找到了一个共同点。在非盟决定寻找“非洲问题的非洲解决方案”之后,以及南非的#学费必须下降运动之后,关于课程非洲化的辩论再次抬头。除了少数例外,尽管有这些发展,非洲知识分子似乎在支持非洲化计划方面进展缓慢。本文着眼于当前非洲知识分子必须应对的一些障碍。本文从古代和近代的历史出发,追溯了造成这些障碍的一些原因。本文从一般理论和具体案例的角度对这些问题进行了讨论。一个结论是,非洲的知识分子并没有达到应有的活跃程度。建议是,它应该变得更加积极和可见,以赢得尊重和认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Afrocentric Analysis of the Practicality of Radical Economic Transformation in the Context of South Africa–China Relations, 2013–2017 Lembede's Afrika for the Afrikans and the Azanian Tradition Today: A Comparative Analysis of Two Forms of Afrikan Nationalism in “South Africa” Is Ifá Divination Girded by Logic? A Case for Ezumezu Logic African Thought and Western (European) Misconception: An Afrocentric Paradigm In Search of Authentic Personhood: An Existentialist Reading of Femi Osofisan’s Tẹgọnni: An African Antigone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1