Comparison of different endometrial preparation protocols in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Murat Önal, M. Ağar, Ayşe Şeyma Küçükakça, T. Gürbüz
{"title":"Comparison of different endometrial preparation protocols in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome","authors":"Murat Önal, M. Ağar, Ayşe Şeyma Küçükakça, T. Gürbüz","doi":"10.38053/acmj.1218259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the most suitable endometrial preparation protocols such as hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) suppression, HRT without GnRH-a suppression and mild ovarian stimulation (OS) for women with  polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).Material and Method: We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 161 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze-all” strategy between December 2018 and August 2020 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: HRT with GnRH-a suppression (n=43); HRT without GnRH-a suppression (n=86); mild-OS (n=32).Results: The biochemical pregnancy results (55.8 % vs 54.65 % vs 53, p=0.900), ongoing pregnancy rates (44.2 % vs 43 % vs 40.62, p=0.572), and abort rates (20.8 % vs 21.3 % vs 23.52, p=0.900) were similar between the HRT with GnRH-a suppression, without GnRH-a suppression and mild-OS, respectively. This study showed no statistically significant difference between the three protocols in laboratory parameters (p>0.05). Conclusion: There was no statistically difference between three groups in terms of pregnancy outcomes. Dependent on clinical experience and facility, one of these protocols could be deployed for FET in women with PCOS.","PeriodicalId":307693,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","volume":"529 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1218259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the most suitable endometrial preparation protocols such as hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) suppression, HRT without GnRH-a suppression and mild ovarian stimulation (OS) for women with  polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).Material and Method: We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 161 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze-all” strategy between December 2018 and August 2020 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: HRT with GnRH-a suppression (n=43); HRT without GnRH-a suppression (n=86); mild-OS (n=32).Results: The biochemical pregnancy results (55.8 % vs 54.65 % vs 53, p=0.900), ongoing pregnancy rates (44.2 % vs 43 % vs 40.62, p=0.572), and abort rates (20.8 % vs 21.3 % vs 23.52, p=0.900) were similar between the HRT with GnRH-a suppression, without GnRH-a suppression and mild-OS, respectively. This study showed no statistically significant difference between the three protocols in laboratory parameters (p>0.05). Conclusion: There was no statistically difference between three groups in terms of pregnancy outcomes. Dependent on clinical experience and facility, one of these protocols could be deployed for FET in women with PCOS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多囊卵巢综合征妇女冻融胚胎移植周期中不同子宫内膜制备方案的比较
目的:本研究旨在探讨抑制促性腺激素释放激素类似物(GnRH-a)的激素替代疗法(HRT)、不抑制GnRH-a的激素替代疗法(HRT)和轻度卵巢刺激(OS)治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)冷冻胚胎移植(FET)的子宫内膜准备方案。材料和方法:我们对161名PCOS女性进行了历史队列分析,这些女性在2018年12月至2020年8月期间因卵巢过度刺激综合征的高风险而接受了“冷冻”策略。采用三种子宫内膜准备方案:HRT联合GnRH-a抑制(n=43);HRT未抑制GnRH-a (n=86);mild-OS (n = 32)。结果:GnRH-a抑制组生化妊娠结果(55.8% vs 54.65% vs 53.3%, p=0.900)、妊娠持续率(44.2% vs 43% vs 40.62, p=0.572)、流产率(20.8% vs 21.3% vs 23.52, p=0.900)与轻度os组差异无统计学意义。本研究显示,三种方案的实验室参数差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论:三组妊娠结局无统计学差异。根据临床经验和设施的不同,这些方案之一可以用于PCOS妇女的FET。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pan-immune inflammation value as a biomarker in ankylosing spondilitis and associated with disease activity ChatGPT in medical writing: enhancing healthcare communication through artificial intelligence and human expertise Temporal alterations in P-wave electrocardiographic metrics post patent foramen ovale closure: a retrospective study Asymptomatic COVID-19 and structural changes in the brain Exploring the nexus: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical correlations of urinary tract infections in diabetes mellitus patients - a comprehensive retrospective analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1