Strain evaluation of left atrial function: Ready for the future?

B. Castaldi, O. Milanesi
{"title":"Strain evaluation of left atrial function: Ready for the future?","authors":"B. Castaldi, O. Milanesi","doi":"10.5812/acvi.19584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Left atrial function is often under-evaluated in the standard echo examination, although this chamber plays a key role in heart function. Probably, mis or late diagnoses of atrial dysfunction are due to technical difficulties such as the thin wall thickness, the lack of robust parameters for functional assessment, and the number of factors potentially affecting or influencing the atrial activity. On the other hand, clinical studies have demonstrated that left atrial dysfunction heavily impacts on morbidity and mortality (1-3). Strain and strain rate imaging (S-SR) is a new echo technique able to study ventricular and atrial function. In particular, S-SR is capable of verifying the elasticity of the atrial wall, bearing in mind that increased atrial stiffness is linked to atrial fibrosis and (as a consequence) to higher arrhythmic risk. Many factors are involved in atrial stiffness such as age, diabetes, hypertension, valvulopathies, obesity, cigarette smoking, left ventricular diastolic function, left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and dyslipidemia as well as its duration. In their study, Sahebjam et al. (4) found that hypertension was the only determinant of S-SR impairment, although in multivariate analysis, none of the parameters (including systolic and diastolic blood pressure) correlated with atrial S-SR. These data, as well as the differences with the studies cited in the article (5), are not surprising given the high prevalence of comorbidity after the fifth decade of life. In addition, disease duration, early diagnosis, therapy efficacy, class(es) of the drug used, and relative dose are all “confounding factors” and are as such hard to be controlled. For these reasons, very large cohorts are needed to give statistical power to such a complex multivariate analysis. The impact of a single factor on atrial S-SR could be studied in pediatric age (6), when comorbidities and drug use are less common. Unfortunately, in pediatric age, it is difficult to demonstrate the clinical relevance of the results obtained. On the other hand, large population studies on adults have shown that, independent of specific causes, impaired diastolic function is related to higher mortality and morbidity(7). The results obtained by Sahebjam et al. demonstrate that, despite normal left atrial volumes, S-SR is lower in patients with one or more cardiovascular risk factors, increasing the evidence of high sensibility of this technique for screening higher-risk patients in different morbid conditions (8). In this way, S-SR could be a precious parameter of a bad outcome: left atrial volume enlargement could be, in fact, late evidence of diastolic dysfunction, and, at that time, the fibrotic process may be (at least partially) irreversible. Limitations to a routine use of S-SR are due to interoperator and inter-software variability (between speckle tracking and tissue Doppler or between two different software packages), poor familiarity of peripheral cardiologists with the technique, costs of special echo machines and software, time needed for post-processing, and lack of age-related normal values. However, S-SR imagingremains an essential method for a better understanding of the mechanic of the heart, an excellent research tool, and reliable software to settle tricky differential diagnoses. If, at the moment, its use is relegated to third-level cardiology centers, software improvements (in terms of reproducibility and automation) could open the way toward a routine use in the future. Was this true glory? The high doom must be pronounced by times to come. Alessandro Manzoni, 5th May","PeriodicalId":429543,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/acvi.19584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left atrial function is often under-evaluated in the standard echo examination, although this chamber plays a key role in heart function. Probably, mis or late diagnoses of atrial dysfunction are due to technical difficulties such as the thin wall thickness, the lack of robust parameters for functional assessment, and the number of factors potentially affecting or influencing the atrial activity. On the other hand, clinical studies have demonstrated that left atrial dysfunction heavily impacts on morbidity and mortality (1-3). Strain and strain rate imaging (S-SR) is a new echo technique able to study ventricular and atrial function. In particular, S-SR is capable of verifying the elasticity of the atrial wall, bearing in mind that increased atrial stiffness is linked to atrial fibrosis and (as a consequence) to higher arrhythmic risk. Many factors are involved in atrial stiffness such as age, diabetes, hypertension, valvulopathies, obesity, cigarette smoking, left ventricular diastolic function, left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and dyslipidemia as well as its duration. In their study, Sahebjam et al. (4) found that hypertension was the only determinant of S-SR impairment, although in multivariate analysis, none of the parameters (including systolic and diastolic blood pressure) correlated with atrial S-SR. These data, as well as the differences with the studies cited in the article (5), are not surprising given the high prevalence of comorbidity after the fifth decade of life. In addition, disease duration, early diagnosis, therapy efficacy, class(es) of the drug used, and relative dose are all “confounding factors” and are as such hard to be controlled. For these reasons, very large cohorts are needed to give statistical power to such a complex multivariate analysis. The impact of a single factor on atrial S-SR could be studied in pediatric age (6), when comorbidities and drug use are less common. Unfortunately, in pediatric age, it is difficult to demonstrate the clinical relevance of the results obtained. On the other hand, large population studies on adults have shown that, independent of specific causes, impaired diastolic function is related to higher mortality and morbidity(7). The results obtained by Sahebjam et al. demonstrate that, despite normal left atrial volumes, S-SR is lower in patients with one or more cardiovascular risk factors, increasing the evidence of high sensibility of this technique for screening higher-risk patients in different morbid conditions (8). In this way, S-SR could be a precious parameter of a bad outcome: left atrial volume enlargement could be, in fact, late evidence of diastolic dysfunction, and, at that time, the fibrotic process may be (at least partially) irreversible. Limitations to a routine use of S-SR are due to interoperator and inter-software variability (between speckle tracking and tissue Doppler or between two different software packages), poor familiarity of peripheral cardiologists with the technique, costs of special echo machines and software, time needed for post-processing, and lack of age-related normal values. However, S-SR imagingremains an essential method for a better understanding of the mechanic of the heart, an excellent research tool, and reliable software to settle tricky differential diagnoses. If, at the moment, its use is relegated to third-level cardiology centers, software improvements (in terms of reproducibility and automation) could open the way toward a routine use in the future. Was this true glory? The high doom must be pronounced by times to come. Alessandro Manzoni, 5th May
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左心房功能应变评估:为未来做好准备了吗?
尽管左房在心功能中起着关键作用,但在标准回声检查中,左房功能往往被低估。可能,心房功能障碍的误诊或晚期诊断是由于技术上的困难,如壁厚薄,缺乏功能评估的可靠参数,以及潜在影响或影响心房活动的因素的数量。另一方面,临床研究表明,左心房功能障碍严重影响发病率和死亡率(1-3)。应变及应变率成像(S-SR)是一种研究心室和心房功能的新型回声技术。特别是,S-SR能够验证心房壁的弹性,记住心房僵硬度增加与心房纤维化有关,因此会增加心律失常的风险。心房僵硬涉及许多因素,如年龄、糖尿病、高血压、瓣膜病、肥胖、吸烟、左室舒张功能、左室肥厚、心肌梗死、心律失常、血脂异常及其持续时间。Sahebjam等(4)在他们的研究中发现高血压是S-SR损害的唯一决定因素,尽管在多变量分析中,没有参数(包括收缩压和舒张压)与心房S-SR相关。这些数据,以及与文章(5)中引用的研究的差异,考虑到50岁以后合并症的高患病率,并不令人惊讶。此外,病程、早期诊断、治疗效果、使用药物类别、相对剂量等都是“混杂因素”,难以控制。由于这些原因,需要非常大的队列来为这种复杂的多变量分析提供统计能力。单一因素对心房S-SR的影响可以在儿童期进行研究(6),此时合并症和药物使用较少见。不幸的是,在儿童年龄,很难证明所获得的结果的临床相关性。另一方面,对成年人的大量人群研究表明,与特定原因无关,舒张功能受损与较高的死亡率和发病率有关(7)。Sahebjam等人的结果表明,尽管左心房容积正常,但具有一种或多种心血管危险因素的患者的S-SR较低,这进一步证明了该技术在筛查不同疾病条件下的高风险患者时具有很高的敏感性(8)。因此,S-SR可能是不良预后的宝贵参数:事实上,左心房容量增大可能是舒张功能不全的晚期证据,此时,纤维化过程可能(至少部分)是不可逆的。常规使用S-SR的限制是由于操作人员和软件之间的可变性(斑点跟踪和组织多普勒之间或两个不同软件包之间),外周心脏病专家对技术的不熟悉,特殊回声机和软件的成本,后处理所需的时间,以及缺乏与年龄相关的正常值。然而,S-SR成像仍然是更好地了解心脏机制的基本方法,是一种优秀的研究工具,也是解决棘手的鉴别诊断的可靠软件。目前,如果它的使用被降级到三级心脏病中心,软件的改进(在可重复性和自动化方面)可能会为未来的常规使用开辟道路。这是真正的荣耀吗?末日必在将来的时候宣告。亚历山德罗·曼佐尼,5月5日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Noninvasive Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve Before and After Ranolazine Administration: Does It Improve in Our Real Patients? Postpartum Inverted Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy After Intravenous Atropine Administration Heart Failure in a Case of Inverted Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy due to Cocaine and Methamphetamine Abuse Treated with Levosimendan Strain Echocardiography Immediately Before Acute Left Ventricular Rupture Following Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction Isolated congenital left ventricular diverticula: A rare cardiac anomaly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1