Experimental Comparison of Misuse Case Maps with Misuse Cases and System Architecture Diagrams for Eliciting Security Vulnerabilities and Mitigations

P. Kárpáti, A. Opdahl, G. Sindre
{"title":"Experimental Comparison of Misuse Case Maps with Misuse Cases and System Architecture Diagrams for Eliciting Security Vulnerabilities and Mitigations","authors":"P. Kárpáti, A. Opdahl, G. Sindre","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2011.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of security aware system development from the start of the engineering process is generally accepted nowadays and is becoming applied in practice. Many recent initiatives support this idea with special focus on security requirements elicitation. However, there are so far no techniques that provide integrated overviews of security threats and system architecture. One way to achieve this is by combining misuse cases with use case maps into misuse case maps (MUCM). This paper presents an experimental evaluation of MUCM diagrams focusing on identification of vulnerabilities and mitigations. The controlled experiment with 33 IT students included a complex hacker intrusion from the literature, illustrated either with MUCM or with alternative diagrams. The results suggest that participants using MUCM found significantly more mitigations than participants using regular misuse cases combined with system architecture diagrams.","PeriodicalId":254443,"journal":{"name":"2011 Sixth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Sixth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2011.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The idea of security aware system development from the start of the engineering process is generally accepted nowadays and is becoming applied in practice. Many recent initiatives support this idea with special focus on security requirements elicitation. However, there are so far no techniques that provide integrated overviews of security threats and system architecture. One way to achieve this is by combining misuse cases with use case maps into misuse case maps (MUCM). This paper presents an experimental evaluation of MUCM diagrams focusing on identification of vulnerabilities and mitigations. The controlled experiment with 33 IT students included a complex hacker intrusion from the literature, illustrated either with MUCM or with alternative diagrams. The results suggest that participants using MUCM found significantly more mitigations than participants using regular misuse cases combined with system architecture diagrams.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用误用案例图、误用案例图和系统架构图进行安全漏洞和缓解的实验比较
安全感知系统开发的思想从工程过程的一开始就被普遍接受,并逐渐在实践中得到应用。许多最近的计划都支持这个想法,并特别关注安全需求的引出。然而,到目前为止,还没有技术能够提供安全威胁和系统架构的集成概述。实现这一点的一种方法是将滥用用例与用例图结合到滥用用例图(MUCM)中。本文提出了MUCM图的实验评估,重点是识别漏洞和缓解。33名IT专业学生参与的对照实验包括一个复杂的黑客入侵案例,该案例用MUCM或替代图表进行说明。结果表明,使用MUCM的参与者比使用常规滥用案例与系统架构图相结合的参与者发现了更多的缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Security Issues in a Synchronous e-Training Platform Deriving Current State RBAC Models from Event Logs Hidden Price of User Authentication: Cost Analysis and Stakeholder Motivation A Proposed Web Access Control System Request Policy Framework for Cooperation of DNS and a Web Browser Non-Parallelizable and Non-Interactive Client Puzzles from Modular Square Roots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1