The Reflection and Reconstruction of the Remand for Retrial in the Criminal Retrial Procedure

Rukeya Abudureyimu
{"title":"The Reflection and Reconstruction of the Remand for Retrial in the Criminal Retrial Procedure","authors":"Rukeya Abudureyimu","doi":"10.11648/J.IJLS.20210402.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For quite a long period of time, the research on criminal trial procedures has mainly focused on the theory and practical issues of remand for retrial in the second-instance procedure, and the retrial procedure as a criminal special relief procedure is not paid enough attention. The special relief nature of the retrial procedure determines that the remand for retrial in the retrial procedure should have its own independent characteristics. However, in judicial practice, the remand for retrial in the second-instance procedure and remand for retrial in the retrial procedure are often mixed in application, which has led to an expansion of the application of remand for retrial. This will not only produce circulating trials, cause the decline of litigation efficiency, but also make it difficult to achieve the purpose of criminal retrial procedures. To solve the problems of the remand for retrial system in the criminal retrial procedure, the focus is to regulate and restrict the application of remand for retrial. Therefore, on the basis of analyzing and summarizing the case data of the remand for retrial in the retrial procedure in recent years, this article systematically reflects and discusses the remand for retrial system, and proposes a limited application model, in order to the remand for retrial system play its function without dissimilation.","PeriodicalId":375311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Society","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJLS.20210402.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For quite a long period of time, the research on criminal trial procedures has mainly focused on the theory and practical issues of remand for retrial in the second-instance procedure, and the retrial procedure as a criminal special relief procedure is not paid enough attention. The special relief nature of the retrial procedure determines that the remand for retrial in the retrial procedure should have its own independent characteristics. However, in judicial practice, the remand for retrial in the second-instance procedure and remand for retrial in the retrial procedure are often mixed in application, which has led to an expansion of the application of remand for retrial. This will not only produce circulating trials, cause the decline of litigation efficiency, but also make it difficult to achieve the purpose of criminal retrial procedures. To solve the problems of the remand for retrial system in the criminal retrial procedure, the focus is to regulate and restrict the application of remand for retrial. Therefore, on the basis of analyzing and summarizing the case data of the remand for retrial in the retrial procedure in recent years, this article systematically reflects and discusses the remand for retrial system, and proposes a limited application model, in order to the remand for retrial system play its function without dissimilation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刑事再审程序还押再审制度的反思与重构
相当长一段时间以来,对刑事审判程序的研究主要集中在二审程序还押再审的理论和实践问题上,而对再审程序作为刑事特殊救济程序的研究不够重视。再审程序的特殊救济性质决定了再审程序中的还押再审应当具有自己的独立特征。然而,在司法实践中,二审程序还押再审与再审程序还押再审在适用上往往混用,导致了还押再审适用范围的扩大。这不仅会产生循环审判,造成诉讼效率的下降,而且会使刑事再审程序的目的难以实现。要解决刑事再审程序中还押再审制度存在的问题,重点是规范和限制还押再审的适用。因此,本文在分析总结近年来再审程序中还押再审案件资料的基础上,对还押再审制度进行了系统的反思和探讨,并提出了一种有限适用模式,以期使还押再审制度发挥其功能而不致异化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing Environmental Public Interest Litigation Research (2003-2023) Through Bibliometrics and CiteSpace: The Perspective of China The Extent to Which the Fault Is Required as a Basic Element of the Tortious Liability in the Iraqi Civil Law: An Analytical Comparative Study Analyzing Ethiopia Banking Sector Credit Policy Against Environmentally Sustainable Lending Analyzing Ethiopia Banking Sector Credit Policy Against Environmentally Sustainable Lending UK Universities Letting Mothers Down: The Experiences of Breastfeeding Mothers in UK Universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1