Socially Responsible Public Procurement Under EU Law and International Agreements: The GPA, CETA and the EU-Ukraine Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area

A. Semple
{"title":"Socially Responsible Public Procurement Under EU Law and International Agreements: The GPA, CETA and the EU-Ukraine Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area","authors":"A. Semple","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2970964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2014 EU procurement directives contain a greatly expanded set of provisions relating to socially responsible public procurement (SRPP). From the application of higher thresholds and ability to limit competition for certain contracts through to the use of social award criteria and contract performance clauses, there are numerous possibilities for contracting authorities to take considerations related to labour law compliance, trading conditions and social inclusion into account. At the same time, the EU has expanded its international commitments in the field of public procurement through the revision of the WTO Government Procurement Agreement (GPA), the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada, and through the establishment of Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs) with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. This paper looks at the extent to which SRPP provisions have been incorporated in these agreements, finding that in a number of areas such as reservation of contracts for disabled and disadvantaged workers, treatment of abnormally low tenders and use of third party certifications, they offer a less supportive framework than the EU directives for SRPP.","PeriodicalId":305946,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2970964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The 2014 EU procurement directives contain a greatly expanded set of provisions relating to socially responsible public procurement (SRPP). From the application of higher thresholds and ability to limit competition for certain contracts through to the use of social award criteria and contract performance clauses, there are numerous possibilities for contracting authorities to take considerations related to labour law compliance, trading conditions and social inclusion into account. At the same time, the EU has expanded its international commitments in the field of public procurement through the revision of the WTO Government Procurement Agreement (GPA), the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada, and through the establishment of Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs) with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. This paper looks at the extent to which SRPP provisions have been incorporated in these agreements, finding that in a number of areas such as reservation of contracts for disabled and disadvantaged workers, treatment of abnormally low tenders and use of third party certifications, they offer a less supportive framework than the EU directives for SRPP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟法律和国际协议下的社会责任公共采购:GPA, CETA和欧盟-乌克兰深度和全面自由贸易区
2014年欧盟采购指令包含了一系列与社会责任公共采购(SRPP)相关的条款。从采用更高的门槛和限制某些合同竞争的能力,到使用社会奖励标准和合同履行条款,缔约当局有许多可能考虑到与遵守劳动法、贸易条件和社会包容有关的因素。与此同时,欧盟通过修订世界贸易组织《政府采购协定》(GPA),与加拿大签署《全面经济贸易协定》(CETA),与乌克兰、摩尔多瓦和格鲁吉亚建立深度和全面自由贸易区(DCFTAs),扩大了其在公共采购领域的国际承诺。本文考察了SRPP条款在这些协议中被纳入的程度,发现在许多领域,如为残疾和弱势工人保留合同,处理异常低的投标和使用第三方认证,它们提供的支持框架不如欧盟SRPP指令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Implementation of an Adjusted Relative Strength Index Model in the Foreign Currency and Energy Markets of Emerging and Developed Economies Commerce, Religion, and the Rule of Law A Financial Macro-Network Approach to Climate Policy Evaluation Cooperatives As Hybrid Approach to Pull Off Sustainable Development and Livelihoods: An Analytical Review The National Credit Act’s Remedies for Reckless Credit in the Mortgage Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1