Social class and preschool language skill: V. Cognitive and semantic mastery of number.

Genetic psychology monographs Pub Date : 1975-08-01
G E Kirk, J Hunt, F Volkmar
{"title":"Social class and preschool language skill: V. Cognitive and semantic mastery of number.","authors":"G E Kirk,&nbsp;J Hunt,&nbsp;F Volkmar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was done to test the validity of two hypotheses of why children, and especially black children, of families of the poverty sector commonly fail in school. Sociologists deny for them either a cognitive or a linguistic deficit, and blame their failures on having to master the unfamiliar dialect of standard English while learning to read. The authors, on the other hand, blame the failures on inadequacies of early preschool experience that result in such deficits as one in semantic mastery of various elementary abstractions. In 1970-1971, 87 four-year-old students (58 black and 29 white) of Head Start and 33 of nursery school were examined with a five part test of number identification. In 1971-1972, the study was repeated with 69 four-year-olds of Head Start and 46 of the nursery school. A much smaller percentage of Head Start than of nursery school identify the numbers of blocks from 2 through 4 by either the heard or spoken mode of number identification. For numbers 5 and 6, most children of both classes fail. The evidence for a semantic deficit for number is very strong. The evidence indicates also a deficit in the span of apprehension and suggests the existence of class differences in the power of examiner demands for heard and for spoken identification to elicit the counting strategy. Evidence of sex differences in semantic mastery of number is absent, and among Head Start children, race differences lack statistical significance. These findings are highly dissonant with the contention of the sociolinguists that no cognitive or linguistic deficits exist and uncovering them can be helpful in guiding compensatory education.</p>","PeriodicalId":75876,"journal":{"name":"Genetic psychology monographs","volume":"92 First half","pages":"131-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic psychology monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was done to test the validity of two hypotheses of why children, and especially black children, of families of the poverty sector commonly fail in school. Sociologists deny for them either a cognitive or a linguistic deficit, and blame their failures on having to master the unfamiliar dialect of standard English while learning to read. The authors, on the other hand, blame the failures on inadequacies of early preschool experience that result in such deficits as one in semantic mastery of various elementary abstractions. In 1970-1971, 87 four-year-old students (58 black and 29 white) of Head Start and 33 of nursery school were examined with a five part test of number identification. In 1971-1972, the study was repeated with 69 four-year-olds of Head Start and 46 of the nursery school. A much smaller percentage of Head Start than of nursery school identify the numbers of blocks from 2 through 4 by either the heard or spoken mode of number identification. For numbers 5 and 6, most children of both classes fail. The evidence for a semantic deficit for number is very strong. The evidence indicates also a deficit in the span of apprehension and suggests the existence of class differences in the power of examiner demands for heard and for spoken identification to elicit the counting strategy. Evidence of sex differences in semantic mastery of number is absent, and among Head Start children, race differences lack statistical significance. These findings are highly dissonant with the contention of the sociolinguists that no cognitive or linguistic deficits exist and uncovering them can be helpful in guiding compensatory education.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会阶层与幼儿语言技能:五、对数字的认知和语义掌握。
这项研究是为了检验两个假设的有效性,即为什么贫困家庭的孩子,尤其是黑人孩子,通常在学校表现不佳。社会学家否认他们有认知或语言缺陷,并将他们的失败归咎于在学习阅读时必须掌握不熟悉的标准英语方言。另一方面,作者将失败归咎于早期学前经验的不足,这导致了对各种基本抽象概念的语义掌握方面的缺陷。本文对1970 ~ 1971年87名四岁儿童(黑人58名,白人29名)和33名幼儿园学生进行了五部分数字识别测验。1971年至1972年,这项研究在69名4岁儿童和46名幼儿园儿童中重复进行。在学前教育中,通过听或说的方式来识别从2到4块的数字的比例比幼儿园小得多。对于第5题和第6题,两个班的大多数孩子都不及格。数字语义缺失的证据非常充分。证据还表明,在理解广度上存在缺陷,并表明,在考官要求听到和说出来的识别能力上存在阶级差异,从而引出计数策略。在数字的语义掌握方面,性别差异的证据是不存在的,而在“先发计划”儿童中,种族差异缺乏统计学意义。这些发现与社会语言学家认为不存在认知或语言缺陷的观点极不一致,发现这些缺陷有助于指导补偿性教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The adaptive-style theory of schizophrenic development: current research with schizophrenics. Adolescent self-consciousness and the imaginary audience. Comprehension of Euclidean space in young children: the early emergence of understanding and its limits. Young children's understanding of the effect of noise and interest level on learning. The psychological effectiveness of pain management procedures in the context of behavioral medicine and medical psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1