{"title":"Folk music quotations and allusions in Latvian composers' neo-romantic symphonic music in the last decades of the 20th century and early 21st century","authors":"Janis Kudins","doi":"10.5937/newso2055213k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the one specific question about folk music quotations and allusions in the symphonic music of Latvian composers in the last third of the 20th century (from the 70s) and the early 21 st century. Several Latvian composers (e.g. Romualds Kalsons, Pēteris Butāns, Pēteris Vasks, Pēteris Plakidis, Juris Karlsons) in their NEO-romantic symphonic works reflects interesting cases of Latvian folk music quotation, quasi quotation or allusion. Overall these are cases that show the composer's ability to actively use and create a similarity with Latvian folk music. However, this aspect raises the following questions. What kind of local (Latvian) traditions regarding folk music use (in general) are represented by Latvian composers? Why, at the end of the 20 th century and the early 21st century, have several composers continued to use folk music quotations or create folk music allusions? What symbolizes the folk music quotations and allusions in the context of the postmodern period's characteristic musical aesthetic and stylistics? It is hoped that this analysis will provoke a fruitful exchange of views on this question from different aspects.","PeriodicalId":315139,"journal":{"name":"New Sound","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Sound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/newso2055213k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article focuses on the one specific question about folk music quotations and allusions in the symphonic music of Latvian composers in the last third of the 20th century (from the 70s) and the early 21 st century. Several Latvian composers (e.g. Romualds Kalsons, Pēteris Butāns, Pēteris Vasks, Pēteris Plakidis, Juris Karlsons) in their NEO-romantic symphonic works reflects interesting cases of Latvian folk music quotation, quasi quotation or allusion. Overall these are cases that show the composer's ability to actively use and create a similarity with Latvian folk music. However, this aspect raises the following questions. What kind of local (Latvian) traditions regarding folk music use (in general) are represented by Latvian composers? Why, at the end of the 20 th century and the early 21st century, have several composers continued to use folk music quotations or create folk music allusions? What symbolizes the folk music quotations and allusions in the context of the postmodern period's characteristic musical aesthetic and stylistics? It is hoped that this analysis will provoke a fruitful exchange of views on this question from different aspects.
本文关注的是拉脱维亚作曲家在20世纪最后三分之一(从70年代开始)和21世纪初的交响乐中关于民间音乐引用和典故的一个具体问题。一些拉脱维亚作曲家(如Romualds Kalsons, Pēteris Butāns, Pēteris Vasks, Pēteris Plakidis, Juris Karlsons)在他们的新浪漫主义交响乐作品中反映了拉脱维亚民间音乐引用,准引用或典故的有趣案例。总的来说,这些案例显示了作曲家积极使用和创造与拉脱维亚民间音乐相似的能力。然而,这方面提出了以下问题。关于民间音乐的使用(一般来说),拉脱维亚作曲家代表了什么样的当地(拉脱维亚)传统?为什么在20世纪末和21世纪初,还有几位作曲家继续使用民间音乐语录或创作民间音乐典故?在后现代时期音乐美学和文体学特征的背景下,民乐引语和典故的象征是什么?希望这一分析将促使各方就这一问题从不同方面富有成效地交换意见。