Who is Spreading Rumours about Vaccines?: Influential User Impact Modelling in Social Networks

P. Kostkova, Vino Mano, H. Larson, W. Schulz
{"title":"Who is Spreading Rumours about Vaccines?: Influential User Impact Modelling in Social Networks","authors":"P. Kostkova, Vino Mano, H. Larson, W. Schulz","doi":"10.1145/3079452.3079505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccine hesitancy, traditionally linked to issues of trust, misinformation and prior beliefs, has been increasingly fuelled by influential groups on social media (SM) and the Internet. Analysis of news media and social networks (SN) accessible in real-time provides a new opportunity for detecting changes in public confidence in vaccines. However, different concerns are important in different regions, and reasons for hesitancy and the role of opinion leaders vary between sub-controversies in the broader vaccination debates. It is therefore important for public health professionals to gain an overview of the emerging debates in cyberspace, identify influential users and rumours, and assess their impact in order to know how to respond. The VAC Medi+Board project aims to visualise the diffusion of rumours through SN and assess the impact of key individuals. We include, as a case study, discussions during winter 2015-16 pertaining to the alleged side-effects of the HPV vaccine.","PeriodicalId":245682,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Digital Health","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3079452.3079505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy, traditionally linked to issues of trust, misinformation and prior beliefs, has been increasingly fuelled by influential groups on social media (SM) and the Internet. Analysis of news media and social networks (SN) accessible in real-time provides a new opportunity for detecting changes in public confidence in vaccines. However, different concerns are important in different regions, and reasons for hesitancy and the role of opinion leaders vary between sub-controversies in the broader vaccination debates. It is therefore important for public health professionals to gain an overview of the emerging debates in cyberspace, identify influential users and rumours, and assess their impact in order to know how to respond. The VAC Medi+Board project aims to visualise the diffusion of rumours through SN and assess the impact of key individuals. We include, as a case study, discussions during winter 2015-16 pertaining to the alleged side-effects of the HPV vaccine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁在散播疫苗的谣言?:社交网络中的影响力用户影响模型
传统上与信任、错误信息和先前信念问题有关的疫苗犹豫,越来越多地受到社交媒体和互联网上有影响力的团体的推动。对可实时获取的新闻媒体和社会网络(SN)进行分析,为发现公众对疫苗信心的变化提供了新的机会。然而,在不同的地区,不同的关注点是重要的,在更广泛的疫苗接种辩论中,犹豫不决的原因和意见领袖的作用各不相同。因此,公共卫生专业人员必须全面了解网络空间中正在出现的辩论,确定有影响力的用户和谣言,并评估其影响,以便了解如何作出反应。VAC medii +Board项目旨在通过SN可视化谣言的传播,并评估关键人物的影响。作为案例研究,我们纳入了2015-16年冬季有关HPV疫苗所谓副作用的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extracting Gene-Disease Relations from Text to Support Biomarker Discovery Towards Health (Aware) Recommender Systems A Regularization Approach for Identifying Cumulative Lagged Effects in Smart Health Applications FitBit Garden: A Mobile Game Designed to Increase Physical Activity in Children Health Misinformation in Search and Social Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1