Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Switzerland

T. Tanquerel
{"title":"Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Switzerland","authors":"T. Tanquerel","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198867609.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines administrative procedure and judicial review in Switzerland. Article 29a of the Federal Constitution (Cst.) provides that 'In a legal dispute, every person has the right to have their case determined by a judicial authority. The Confederation and the Cantons may by law preclude the determination by the courts of certain exceptional categories of case'. It is widely recognized that Article 29a Cst. grants the right of judicial review of administrative action to everyone whose rights or obligations are affected by such an action. Judicial review of administrative action is entrusted partly to courts with general jurisdiction, partly to specialized administrative courts, and partly to specific independent appellate committees. As a general principle, procedural rights are deemed 'formal rights' by the Federal Tribunal, whose violation would cause the act or the measure at stake to be quashed irrespective of its substantive merits. However, there are certain acts or measures issued by Swiss authorities which escape judicial control, when those acts or measures are primarily of a political nature. When an act is appealed before a court, the only question at stake is the validity of the act. If the court finds it unlawful for procedural or substantive reasons, it will either quash it or modify it to make it lawful.","PeriodicalId":147116,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review of Administration in Europe","volume":"1998 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review of Administration in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867609.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines administrative procedure and judicial review in Switzerland. Article 29a of the Federal Constitution (Cst.) provides that 'In a legal dispute, every person has the right to have their case determined by a judicial authority. The Confederation and the Cantons may by law preclude the determination by the courts of certain exceptional categories of case'. It is widely recognized that Article 29a Cst. grants the right of judicial review of administrative action to everyone whose rights or obligations are affected by such an action. Judicial review of administrative action is entrusted partly to courts with general jurisdiction, partly to specialized administrative courts, and partly to specific independent appellate committees. As a general principle, procedural rights are deemed 'formal rights' by the Federal Tribunal, whose violation would cause the act or the measure at stake to be quashed irrespective of its substantive merits. However, there are certain acts or measures issued by Swiss authorities which escape judicial control, when those acts or measures are primarily of a political nature. When an act is appealed before a court, the only question at stake is the validity of the act. If the court finds it unlawful for procedural or substantive reasons, it will either quash it or modify it to make it lawful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞士的行政程序与司法审查
本章考察瑞士的行政程序和司法审查。《联邦宪法》第29a条规定:“在法律纠纷中,每个人都有权要求司法机关对其案件作出裁决。联邦和各州可以通过法律排除法院对某些特殊类别案件的裁决”。人们普遍认为,第29条a款规定。赋予权利或义务受行政行为影响的每个人对行政行为进行司法审查的权利。行政行为的司法审查部分委托给具有一般管辖权的法院,部分委托给专门的行政法院,部分委托给具体的独立上诉委员会。作为一项一般原则,程序性权利被联邦法庭视为“正式权利”,违反这些权利将导致相关行为或措施被撤销,无论其实质性是非事实如何。但是,瑞士当局颁布的某些行为或措施,如果主要是政治性的,则不受司法控制。当一项行为向法院提起上诉时,唯一利害攸关的问题是该行为的有效性。如果法院因程序或实质原因认定其不合法,它将撤销该决定或修改该决定使其合法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Belgium Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in the United Kingdom Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Ukraine The Common Core of European Administrative Laws and the Pan-European General Principles of Good Administration Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1