Government Failure vs. the Market Process during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Benjamin Powell
{"title":"Government Failure vs. the Market Process during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Benjamin Powell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3919790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that government policies such as lockdowns and command and control regulation of businesses have not efficiently addressed the nature of the COVID-19 externality because these interventions fail to take account of insights from standard price theory about the reciprocal nature of externalities and the allocation of rights such that least cost avoiders adjust behavior. Furthermore these interventions stifled the market’s entrepreneurial adjustment process that partially ameliorates the externalities over time.","PeriodicalId":129815,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3919790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper argues that government policies such as lockdowns and command and control regulation of businesses have not efficiently addressed the nature of the COVID-19 externality because these interventions fail to take account of insights from standard price theory about the reciprocal nature of externalities and the allocation of rights such that least cost avoiders adjust behavior. Furthermore these interventions stifled the market’s entrepreneurial adjustment process that partially ameliorates the externalities over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间政府失灵与市场过程
本文认为,封锁和对企业的命令和控制监管等政府政策并没有有效地解决COVID-19外部性的本质,因为这些干预措施没有考虑到标准价格理论关于外部性的互惠性质和权利分配的见解,从而使最低成本规避者调整行为。此外,这些干预措施抑制了市场的企业家调整过程,随着时间的推移,这在一定程度上改善了外部性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opportunity and Inequality Across Generations Auctioning Corporate Bonds: A Uniform-Price under Investment Mandates The Role of Effort Cost Perception in Outcome Bias (Mis-)Perception of Inequality: Measures, Determinants, and Consequences Dynamic Resource Allocation with Cost Externality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1