Supply-demand ratio and on-demand spatial service brokers: a summary of results

Reem Y. Ali, E. Eftelioglu, S. Shekhar, Shounak Athavale, Eric Marsman
{"title":"Supply-demand ratio and on-demand spatial service brokers: a summary of results","authors":"Reem Y. Ali, E. Eftelioglu, S. Shekhar, Shounak Athavale, Eric Marsman","doi":"10.1145/3003965.3003974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates an on-demand spatial service broker for suggesting service provider propositions and the corresponding estimated waiting times to mobile consumers while meeting the consumer's maximum travel distance and waiting time constraints. The goal of the broker is to maximize the number of matched requests while also keeping the \"ecosystem\" functioning by engaging many service providers and balancing their assigned requests to provide them with incentives to stay in the system. This problem is important because of its many related societal applications in the on-demand and sharing economy (e.g. on-demand ride hailing services, on-demand food delivery, etc). Challenges of this problem include the need to satisfy many conflicting requirements for the broker, consumers and service providers and the high computational complexity for a large number of consumers and service providers. Related work in spatial crowdsourcing and ridesharing has mainly focused on maximizing the number of matched requests and minimizing travel cost, but did not consider the importance of engaging more service providers and balancing their assignments, which could become a priority when the available supply exceeds the demand. In this work, we propose a new category of service provider centric heuristics for meeting these conflicting requirements. We evaluated our algorithms using synthetic datasets with real-world characteristics. Experimental results show that our proposed heuristics can achieve a larger number of matched requests when supply and demand are balanced. They also engage a larger number of service providers with a more balanced provider assignment when the available supply greatly exceeds demand.","PeriodicalId":376984,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3003965.3003974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper investigates an on-demand spatial service broker for suggesting service provider propositions and the corresponding estimated waiting times to mobile consumers while meeting the consumer's maximum travel distance and waiting time constraints. The goal of the broker is to maximize the number of matched requests while also keeping the "ecosystem" functioning by engaging many service providers and balancing their assigned requests to provide them with incentives to stay in the system. This problem is important because of its many related societal applications in the on-demand and sharing economy (e.g. on-demand ride hailing services, on-demand food delivery, etc). Challenges of this problem include the need to satisfy many conflicting requirements for the broker, consumers and service providers and the high computational complexity for a large number of consumers and service providers. Related work in spatial crowdsourcing and ridesharing has mainly focused on maximizing the number of matched requests and minimizing travel cost, but did not consider the importance of engaging more service providers and balancing their assignments, which could become a priority when the available supply exceeds the demand. In this work, we propose a new category of service provider centric heuristics for meeting these conflicting requirements. We evaluated our algorithms using synthetic datasets with real-world characteristics. Experimental results show that our proposed heuristics can achieve a larger number of matched requests when supply and demand are balanced. They also engage a larger number of service providers with a more balanced provider assignment when the available supply greatly exceeds demand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供求比与按需空间服务中介:结果综述
本文研究了一个按需空间服务代理,在满足移动消费者最大出行距离和等待时间约束的情况下,向移动消费者提供服务提供商的建议和相应的估计等待时间。代理的目标是最大化匹配请求的数量,同时通过吸引许多服务提供者并平衡其分配的请求来保持“生态系统”的功能,从而为他们提供留在系统中的激励。这个问题很重要,因为它在按需和共享经济中有许多相关的社会应用(例如按需叫车服务、按需送餐等)。这个问题的挑战包括需要满足代理、消费者和服务提供者的许多相互冲突的需求,以及大量消费者和服务提供者的高计算复杂性。空间众包和拼车的相关工作主要集中在最大化匹配请求的数量和最小化出行成本,但没有考虑到吸引更多服务提供商和平衡他们的任务的重要性,当可用的供应超过需求时,这可能成为优先考虑的问题。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种新的以服务提供商为中心的启发式方法来满足这些相互冲突的需求。我们使用具有现实世界特征的合成数据集来评估我们的算法。实验结果表明,在供需平衡的情况下,我们提出的启发式算法可以获得更多的匹配请求。当可用的供应大大超过需求时,它们还会与更多的服务提供者进行更平衡的提供者分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conventionalized gestures for the interaction of people in traffic with autonomous vehicles On the effectiveness of removing location information from trajectory data for preserving location privacy What are the potentialities of crowdsourcing for dynamic maps of on-street parking spaces? Energy impact of different penetrations of connected and automated vehicles: a preliminary assessment Cross-region traffic prediction for China on OpenStreetMap
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1