Dynamic analysis of OLTC and voltage regulator under active network management considering different load profiles

Sultan S. Alkaabi, H. Zeineldin, V. Khadkikar, M. E. Moursi
{"title":"Dynamic analysis of OLTC and voltage regulator under active network management considering different load profiles","authors":"Sultan S. Alkaabi, H. Zeineldin, V. Khadkikar, M. E. Moursi","doi":"10.1109/ISGT.2017.8085970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a comparative study of coordinated voltage control (CVC) strategies for on-load tap-changers (OLTCs) and voltage regulator (VRs) under active and passive network management schemes (ANM and PNM). In PNM scheme, OLTC and VR are restricted to only regulate the secondary bus voltages at fixed set-points, while in ANM scheme, control of the secondary bus voltages within the statutory voltage range is allowed, thus providing area-based voltage controls. In this paper, the dynamic model of a 33kV 16-bus United Kingdom generic distribution system (UKGDS) is firstly implemented in PSCAD/EMTDC and validated with a steady-state model, using optimal power flow (OPF)-based technique, developed in GAMS software. Secondly, the OLTC and VR controls under ANM and PNM schemes are developed with discrete tap-changers, and tested considering different load profiles and dynamic loads. The results show that the ANM scheme allows considerable utilization of OLTC and VR compared to PNM scheme, but also may increase the loading of these devices depending on load levels and voltage profile in the power network.","PeriodicalId":296398,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT.2017.8085970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper provides a comparative study of coordinated voltage control (CVC) strategies for on-load tap-changers (OLTCs) and voltage regulator (VRs) under active and passive network management schemes (ANM and PNM). In PNM scheme, OLTC and VR are restricted to only regulate the secondary bus voltages at fixed set-points, while in ANM scheme, control of the secondary bus voltages within the statutory voltage range is allowed, thus providing area-based voltage controls. In this paper, the dynamic model of a 33kV 16-bus United Kingdom generic distribution system (UKGDS) is firstly implemented in PSCAD/EMTDC and validated with a steady-state model, using optimal power flow (OPF)-based technique, developed in GAMS software. Secondly, the OLTC and VR controls under ANM and PNM schemes are developed with discrete tap-changers, and tested considering different load profiles and dynamic loads. The results show that the ANM scheme allows considerable utilization of OLTC and VR compared to PNM scheme, but also may increase the loading of these devices depending on load levels and voltage profile in the power network.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑不同负荷分布的主动电网管理下OLTC和电压调节器的动态分析
本文对有源和无源网络管理方案(ANM和PNM)下有载分接开关(oltc)和电压调节器(VRs)的协调电压控制(CVC)策略进行了比较研究。在PNM方案中,OLTC和VR被限制只能在固定的设定点调节副母线电压,而在ANM方案中,允许将副母线电压控制在法定电压范围内,从而提供基于区域的电压控制。本文首先在PSCAD/EMTDC中实现了33kV 16母线英国通用配电系统(UKGDS)的动态模型,并利用GAMS软件开发的基于最优潮流(OPF)的稳态模型进行了验证。其次,采用离散分接开关设计了ANM和PNM方案下的OLTC和VR控制,并在不同负载和动态负载下进行了测试。结果表明,与PNM方案相比,ANM方案可以充分利用OLTC和VR,但也可能根据电网中的负载水平和电压分布增加这些器件的负载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A cyber-physical resilience metric for smart grids Optimal allocation of photovoltaic systems and energy storage systems considering constraints of both transmission and distribution systems Stochastic dynamic power flow analysis based on stochastic response surfarce method and ARMA-GARCH model Towards the improvement of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for service restoration Multi-level control framework for enhanced flexibility of active distribution network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1