Communicating psychology to policy, what’s the problem?

Hayley Gains
{"title":"Communicating psychology to policy, what’s the problem?","authors":"Hayley Gains","doi":"10.53841/bpspag.2021.1.119.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid–19 pandemic has demonstrated the desire of government to implement evidence–based behavioural policies. However, questions still remain as to how scientists communicate effectively with policymakers. Ferguson (2015) discusses the contributory role of public mistrust in psychological science, due to internal issues such as the replication crisis and questionable research practices. I suggest that there is a more fundamental disconnect between psychologists and policymakers. More pertinent barriers to effective communication are the differential aims of understanding versus influencing behaviour, and the tension between maintaining objectivity and engaging with advocacy.","PeriodicalId":166013,"journal":{"name":"PsyPag Quarterly","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PsyPag Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspag.2021.1.119.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Covid–19 pandemic has demonstrated the desire of government to implement evidence–based behavioural policies. However, questions still remain as to how scientists communicate effectively with policymakers. Ferguson (2015) discusses the contributory role of public mistrust in psychological science, due to internal issues such as the replication crisis and questionable research practices. I suggest that there is a more fundamental disconnect between psychologists and policymakers. More pertinent barriers to effective communication are the differential aims of understanding versus influencing behaviour, and the tension between maintaining objectivity and engaging with advocacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将心理学与政策沟通,有什么问题吗?
2019冠状病毒病大流行表明了政府实施循证行为政策的愿望。然而,科学家如何有效地与决策者沟通的问题仍然存在。Ferguson(2015)讨论了公众不信任在心理科学中的贡献作用,由于内部问题,如复制危机和可疑的研究实践。我认为,心理学家和政策制定者之间存在着更根本的脱节。有效沟通的更相关障碍是理解与影响行为的不同目标,以及保持客观与参与宣传之间的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Positive expressive writing interventions for improving wellbeing Psychosis: An ever-changing conceptualisation Sadness, sorrow, or despair: Improving existing tasks assessing emotional granularity An autoethnographic exploration of anxiety in a cognitive assessment during a clinical neuropsychology placement Evaluation of training effectiveness in simulation-based cricothyroidotomy programme for evidence-informed hospital management: An executive summary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1