Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-objective optimization Algorithms

Dimitris G. Tsarmpopoulos, A. Papanikolaou, S. Kotsiantis, T. Grapsa, G. Androulakis
{"title":"Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-objective optimization Algorithms","authors":"Dimitris G. Tsarmpopoulos, A. Papanikolaou, S. Kotsiantis, T. Grapsa, G. Androulakis","doi":"10.1109/IISA.2019.8900773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-objective optimization is undoubtedly one field with many applications in real life situations and constitutes a highly active research area. In this paper, a comparison among high-performing multi-objective metaheuristics optimization algorithms is provided. For the comparison, three well-known multi-objective optimization algorithms and the Random Search algorithm are utilized on benchmark multi-objective optimization test families. Their results are compared with the use of two different metrics in order to be fully and effectively assessed. Their results are also discussed, and some future research points are proposed.","PeriodicalId":371385,"journal":{"name":"2019 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA)","volume":"41 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA.2019.8900773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Multi-objective optimization is undoubtedly one field with many applications in real life situations and constitutes a highly active research area. In this paper, a comparison among high-performing multi-objective metaheuristics optimization algorithms is provided. For the comparison, three well-known multi-objective optimization algorithms and the Random Search algorithm are utilized on benchmark multi-objective optimization test families. Their results are compared with the use of two different metrics in order to be fully and effectively assessed. Their results are also discussed, and some future research points are proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多目标优化算法的性能评价与比较
多目标优化无疑是一个在现实生活中应用广泛的领域,也是一个非常活跃的研究领域。本文对几种高性能多目标元启发式优化算法进行了比较。为了进行比较,在基准多目标优化测试族中使用了三种知名的多目标优化算法和随机搜索算法。他们的结果与使用两种不同的指标进行比较,以便得到充分和有效的评估。并对研究结果进行了讨论,提出了今后的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A NoSQL Approach for Aspect Mining of Cultural Heritage Streaming Data Advancing Adult Online Education through a SN-Learning Environment Smart educational games and Consent under the scope of General Data Protection Regulation Timetable Scheduling Using a Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization with Local Search Approach Data Mining for Smart Cities: Predicting Electricity Consumption by Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1