Delivery workers and the interplay of digital and mobility (in)justice

Giovanni Vecchio , Ignacio Tiznado-Aitken , Camila Albornoz , Martín Tironi
{"title":"Delivery workers and the interplay of digital and mobility (in)justice","authors":"Giovanni Vecchio ,&nbsp;Ignacio Tiznado-Aitken ,&nbsp;Camila Albornoz ,&nbsp;Martín Tironi","doi":"10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>On-demand delivery services are experiencing a moment of expansion, which the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to foster. For cities in quarantine, these services allow the supply of food and other primary goods without moving from home, making riders move and access them on behalf of the clients. During a pandemic, working as a rider potentially increases the risks of an already precarious job given the contractual arrangements and the algorithmic control that characterize this gig economy sector. We argue that platforms have generated forms of injustice that are reproduced and amplified by digital platforms encoded in the Global North, which are governed by regulations and optimization criteria that do not dialogue with the precarious reality of Global South cities. Focusing on the case of Santiago de Chile, our analysis draws on the triangulation and complementarity of two instruments: interviews before the COVID-19 pandemic and surveys involving riders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings show that platforms generate specific forms of injustice that affect riders and their mobility in particular. The COVID-19 pandemic worsened such forms of digital injustice, increasing the pressure for constantly working and the exposure of riders to threats such as accidents, criminality and health risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100377,"journal":{"name":"Digital Geography and Society","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100036"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378322000113/pdfft?md5=51061d3e42f19ced6e921743ad925cc6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666378322000113-main.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Geography and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378322000113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

On-demand delivery services are experiencing a moment of expansion, which the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to foster. For cities in quarantine, these services allow the supply of food and other primary goods without moving from home, making riders move and access them on behalf of the clients. During a pandemic, working as a rider potentially increases the risks of an already precarious job given the contractual arrangements and the algorithmic control that characterize this gig economy sector. We argue that platforms have generated forms of injustice that are reproduced and amplified by digital platforms encoded in the Global North, which are governed by regulations and optimization criteria that do not dialogue with the precarious reality of Global South cities. Focusing on the case of Santiago de Chile, our analysis draws on the triangulation and complementarity of two instruments: interviews before the COVID-19 pandemic and surveys involving riders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings show that platforms generate specific forms of injustice that affect riders and their mobility in particular. The COVID-19 pandemic worsened such forms of digital injustice, increasing the pressure for constantly working and the exposure of riders to threats such as accidents, criminality and health risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快递员以及数字和移动性在司法中的相互作用
按需配送服务正在经历扩张的时刻,这是COVID-19大流行的促进因素。对于被隔离的城市,这些服务允许在不离开家的情况下供应食品和其他初级商品,使乘客能够代表客户移动和获取。在大流行期间,鉴于这一零工经济部门的合同安排和算法控制特征,作为一名骑手可能会增加本已不稳定的工作的风险。我们认为,平台产生了各种形式的不公正,这些不公正被全球北方编码的数字平台复制和放大,这些平台受法规和优化标准的约束,与全球南方城市不稳定的现实不对话。以智利圣地亚哥为例,我们的分析利用了两种工具的三角测量法和互补性:COVID-19大流行前的访谈和COVID-19大流行期间涉及骑手的调查。我们的研究结果表明,平台产生了特定形式的不公正,特别是影响了乘客和他们的机动性。2019冠状病毒病大流行加剧了这种形式的数字不公正,增加了持续工作的压力,并使乘客面临事故、犯罪和健康风险等威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Broker bureaucracies: The subsidiary offices of the digitalizing state (Retail) platform legitimation through municipal partnerships? Characterizing climate change sentiments in Alaska on social media Counter-mapping platformization. Rethinking the spatial differentiation of platform control, labor relations and restaurant virtualization in proprietary markets for food-delivery Synthetic geospatial data and fake geography: A case study on the implications of AI-derived data in a data-intensive society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1