Software Process Improvement Initiatives in Small and Medium Firms: A Systematic Review

M. Almomani, S. Basri, Saipunidzam Mahamad, A. Bajeh
{"title":"Software Process Improvement Initiatives in Small and Medium Firms: A Systematic Review","authors":"M. Almomani, S. Basri, Saipunidzam Mahamad, A. Bajeh","doi":"10.1109/ACSAT.2014.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, software firms are playing very important roles in economies all over the world, and majority of these firms are Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). The SMEs recognize that it is important to improve their development processes and activities in order to produce software with high quality and to be competitive in the software industry. However, several studies have shown that the SMEs used ad-hoc manner in their development processes and they suffer from lack of the knowledge and resources to do Software Process Improvement (SPI). In this paper, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is used to identify and discuss the SPI initiatives in SME software firms. The results of the systematic review showed that the majority of software process improvement initiatives in SME firms are carried out in America and Europe. Only in one Asian country, Hong Kong was the SPI initiative considered and CMM Fast-Track was the model developed. The developed model did not cover all the CMM levels, only levels 1 and 2 were considered. In conclusion, many Software Process Improvement initiatives have been proposed for SME software firms but they have shortcomings such as lack of generalizability and take a lot of time to gain the benefits/advantage of the SPI model after implementation.","PeriodicalId":137452,"journal":{"name":"2014 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSAT.2014.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Nowadays, software firms are playing very important roles in economies all over the world, and majority of these firms are Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). The SMEs recognize that it is important to improve their development processes and activities in order to produce software with high quality and to be competitive in the software industry. However, several studies have shown that the SMEs used ad-hoc manner in their development processes and they suffer from lack of the knowledge and resources to do Software Process Improvement (SPI). In this paper, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is used to identify and discuss the SPI initiatives in SME software firms. The results of the systematic review showed that the majority of software process improvement initiatives in SME firms are carried out in America and Europe. Only in one Asian country, Hong Kong was the SPI initiative considered and CMM Fast-Track was the model developed. The developed model did not cover all the CMM levels, only levels 1 and 2 were considered. In conclusion, many Software Process Improvement initiatives have been proposed for SME software firms but they have shortcomings such as lack of generalizability and take a lot of time to gain the benefits/advantage of the SPI model after implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中小企业的软件过程改进计划:系统回顾
如今,软件公司在世界各地的经济中扮演着非常重要的角色,这些公司中的大多数是中小型企业(SMEs)。中小企业认识到,为了生产高质量的软件并在软件业中具有竞争力,改进其开发过程和活动是非常重要的。然而,一些研究表明,中小企业在其开发过程中使用临时方式,他们缺乏知识和资源来进行软件过程改进(SPI)。本文采用系统文献综述(SLR)的方法来识别和讨论中小企业软件企业的SPI举措。系统回顾的结果表明,大多数中小企业的软件过程改进计划是在美国和欧洲进行的。只有在一个亚洲国家,香港考虑了SPI倡议,并开发了CMM快速通道模型。所开发的模型没有覆盖CMM的所有级别,只考虑了级别1和级别2。总之,许多软件过程改进计划已经为中小企业软件公司提出,但它们有缺点,例如缺乏通用性,并且在实施后需要花费大量时间才能获得SPI模型的好处/优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management Dimension for Assessing Organizations' Readiness toward Business Intelligence Systems Multi-user Searchable Encryption with Fine-Grained Access Control without Key Sharing Mobile Online Services and Measuring User Satisfaction: Study of Kuwait Elicit the Best Ways through Identify Congestion Places Design a New Proposed Route Optimization Scheme Based NEMO-Centric MANEMO (NCM)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1