Normalization and mental health support: a comparative study on day-activity facilities for people with mental disabilities in Japan and Sweden

B. Eriksson, Shinji Ishida, M. Ishibashi, Masahiro Iwakiri, Kirsti Kuusela, Masaaki Nimonji
{"title":"Normalization and mental health support: a comparative study on day-activity facilities for people with mental disabilities in Japan and Sweden","authors":"B. Eriksson, Shinji Ishida, M. Ishibashi, Masahiro Iwakiri, Kirsti Kuusela, Masaaki Nimonji","doi":"10.1080/17486831.2012.636251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many countries, including Japan and Sweden, societal help and support for people with mental disabilities have been reformed, with the aim of achieving a more normalized life and closer integration in the local community for this group. Day-activity facilities may be one tool for such a transition. In this article, three day-activity facilities in Japan and Sweden respectively are examined and compared. Managers at all six units were interviewed and given identical – qualitative and quantitative – questions. The data were systematically cross-culturally compared, and the results presented in seven categories: general conditions, activities, participants, organization/management/staff, finances, ideological features, and factors of success and failure. There is an overarching similarity between the two countries, but there are also differences in some respects. The Japanese units are private, while the Swedish units are publicly run. In both countries a broad range of activities are offered in the units. The Japanese units seem to stress factors of friendship, a calm environment and feeling comfortable and safe, while the Swedish units are somewhat more directed towards personal relations, support in daily life and job preparation. Day-activity facilities seem to facilitate normalization and integration in the local community, but need to be continuously scrutinized and improved.","PeriodicalId":270572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Social Welfare","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17486831.2012.636251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many countries, including Japan and Sweden, societal help and support for people with mental disabilities have been reformed, with the aim of achieving a more normalized life and closer integration in the local community for this group. Day-activity facilities may be one tool for such a transition. In this article, three day-activity facilities in Japan and Sweden respectively are examined and compared. Managers at all six units were interviewed and given identical – qualitative and quantitative – questions. The data were systematically cross-culturally compared, and the results presented in seven categories: general conditions, activities, participants, organization/management/staff, finances, ideological features, and factors of success and failure. There is an overarching similarity between the two countries, but there are also differences in some respects. The Japanese units are private, while the Swedish units are publicly run. In both countries a broad range of activities are offered in the units. The Japanese units seem to stress factors of friendship, a calm environment and feeling comfortable and safe, while the Swedish units are somewhat more directed towards personal relations, support in daily life and job preparation. Day-activity facilities seem to facilitate normalization and integration in the local community, but need to be continuously scrutinized and improved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常化与心理健康支持:日本和瑞典心理残疾者日间活动设施的比较研究
在包括日本和瑞典在内的许多国家,对精神残疾者的社会帮助和支助进行了改革,目的是使这一群体的生活更加正常化,并更密切地融入当地社区。日常活动设施可能是这种转变的一个工具。本文分别对日本和瑞典的三种日间活动设施进行了考察和比较。所有六个单位的管理人员都接受了采访,并提出了相同的定性和定量问题。数据进行了系统的跨文化比较,并将结果分为七个类别:一般情况、活动、参与者、组织/管理/人员、财务、思想特征以及成功和失败的因素。这两个国家有很大的相似之处,但在某些方面也存在差异。日本的单位是私人的,而瑞典的单位是公共经营的。在这两个国家,各单位都提供范围广泛的活动。日本单位似乎强调友谊、平静的环境和感觉舒适和安全的因素,而瑞典单位则更侧重于个人关系、日常生活中的支持和工作准备。日活动设施似乎促进了当地社区的正常化和融合,但需要不断审查和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the financial crisis on happiness in affluent European countries Active ageing and pensions in the European Union Time and punishment: a comparison of UK and US time bank use in criminal justice systems Historical perspectives on North Korea: a brief introduction and bibliography Income inequality and its driving forces in transitional countries: evidence from Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1