{"title":"Copyhold","authors":"J. Baker","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198847809.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principal purpose of this chapter is to show how the tenant by copy of court roll evolved from a manorial tenant in villeinage, with no protection against his lord at common law, into a landowner with a property right enforceable in the central courts. The means was the action of ejectment, which rested on a lease of the copyholder’s possessory interest. This was settled in the King’s Bench by the 1570s, though the Common Pleas did not at first acquiesce. The copyholder’s estate was governed by the custom of the manor of which the land was held, and this gave rise to difficulties over its legal qualities, particularly with regard to entailed copyhold.","PeriodicalId":197105,"journal":{"name":"Baker and Milsom Sources of English Legal History","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baker and Milsom Sources of English Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198847809.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The principal purpose of this chapter is to show how the tenant by copy of court roll evolved from a manorial tenant in villeinage, with no protection against his lord at common law, into a landowner with a property right enforceable in the central courts. The means was the action of ejectment, which rested on a lease of the copyholder’s possessory interest. This was settled in the King’s Bench by the 1570s, though the Common Pleas did not at first acquiesce. The copyholder’s estate was governed by the custom of the manor of which the land was held, and this gave rise to difficulties over its legal qualities, particularly with regard to entailed copyhold.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
享有的不动产权
本章的主要目的是展示法院名册副本上的佃户是如何从在普通法上不受领主保护的农奴制庄园佃户演变成在中央法院拥有可强制执行的财产权的土地所有者的。其手段是地产逐出的行为,其依据是公契持有人的占有利益的租赁。1570年代,这在国王席上得到了解决,尽管下议院一开始并没有默许。公契持有人的地产受其所持有土地的庄园的习俗所支配,这就造成了其法律性质上的困难,特别是关于附带的公契持有人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Actions on the case for deceit Assumpsit for misfeasance Actions on the case for various kinds of economic loss Trespass Uses, wills and trusts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1