Protecting the questionably knowledgeable user of accounting information: a defence of paternalism in the accounting profession

Babonyire Adafula, W. A. Atuilik, J. K. Amoh
{"title":"Protecting the questionably knowledgeable user of accounting information: a defence of paternalism in the accounting profession","authors":"Babonyire Adafula, W. A. Atuilik, J. K. Amoh","doi":"10.1504/IJCA.2018.10013409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accounting profession has drawn and continues to draw criticisms from the downsides of paternalism based on libertarian economic views and the false assumption of the ability of people to make rational choices that are in their best interest. The modest goal of this paper is to call for a rethink in views on the paternalistic characterisation of the accounting profession. We argue that the accounting professional possesses specialised skill, expertise, and training for which he/she is hired by the client. Second, we assert that a prerequisite for understanding and use of accounting information is 'reasonable knowledge of business and commerce'. The justifications for the paternalistic orientation of the accounting profession are overwhelmingly persuasive. The paper therefore asserts that the proto-paternalistic posture of the accounting profession is an ineluctable phenomenon. Contemporary demands for reporting complex transactions and the incessant calls for stringent oversight of accounting practice make paternalism compelling.","PeriodicalId":343538,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Accounting","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCA.2018.10013409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accounting profession has drawn and continues to draw criticisms from the downsides of paternalism based on libertarian economic views and the false assumption of the ability of people to make rational choices that are in their best interest. The modest goal of this paper is to call for a rethink in views on the paternalistic characterisation of the accounting profession. We argue that the accounting professional possesses specialised skill, expertise, and training for which he/she is hired by the client. Second, we assert that a prerequisite for understanding and use of accounting information is 'reasonable knowledge of business and commerce'. The justifications for the paternalistic orientation of the accounting profession are overwhelmingly persuasive. The paper therefore asserts that the proto-paternalistic posture of the accounting profession is an ineluctable phenomenon. Contemporary demands for reporting complex transactions and the incessant calls for stringent oversight of accounting practice make paternalism compelling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护知识存疑的会计信息使用者:对会计行业家长式作风的辩护
基于自由意志主义经济观点的家长式作风的缺点,以及人们有能力做出符合他们最大利益的理性选择的错误假设,已经并将继续招致对会计行业的批评。本文的适度目标是呼吁重新思考对会计职业的家长式特征的看法。我们认为,会计专业人员拥有专业技能,专业知识和培训,因此他/她被客户雇用。其次,我们断言理解和使用会计信息的先决条件是“合理的商业知识”。会计行业家长式倾向的理由极具说服力。因此,本文断言,会计行业的原始家长式姿态是一种不可避免的现象。当代对报告复杂交易的需求,以及对会计实践严格监督的不断呼吁,使得家长式作风引人注目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does corporate governance matter in the failures of listed home-grown banks A critical review of the 2018 conceptual framework of IASB: a shift towards the primary users of the GPFRs Understanding MSME-owned women entrepreneurs in Bangladesh: exploring motives, challenges, and success factors Increasing globalisation in accounting publications Accounting for e-commerce sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1