Quoted staged rewriting: a practical approach to library-defined optimizations

L. Parreaux, A. Shaikhha, Christoph E. Koch
{"title":"Quoted staged rewriting: a practical approach to library-defined optimizations","authors":"L. Parreaux, A. Shaikhha, Christoph E. Koch","doi":"10.1145/3136040.3136043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Staging has proved a successful technique for programmatically removing code abstractions, thereby allowing for faster program execution while retaining a high-level interface for the programmer. Unfortunately, techniques based on staging suffer from a number of problems — ranging from practicalities to fundamental limitations — which have prevented their widespread adoption. We introduce Quoted Staged Rewriting (QSR), an approach that uses type-safe, pattern matching-enabled quasiquotes to define optimizations. The approach is “staged” in two ways: first, rewrite rules can execute arbitrary code during pattern matching and code reconstruction, leveraging the power and flexibility of staging; second, library designers can orchestrate the application of successive rewriting phases (stages). The advantages of using quasiquote-based rewriting are that library designers never have to deal directly with the intermediate representation (IR), and that it allows for non-intrusive optimizations — in contrast with staging, it is not necessary to adapt the entire library and user programs to accommodate optimizations. We show how Squid, a Scala macro-based framework, enables QSR and renders library-defined optimizations more practical than ever before: library designers write domain-specific optimizers that users invoke transparently on delimited portions of their code base. As a motivating example we describe an implementation of stream fusion (a well-known deforestation technique) that is both simpler and more powerful than the state of the art, and can readily be used by Scala programmers with no knowledge of metaprogramming.","PeriodicalId":398999,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Generative Programming: Concepts and Experiences","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Generative Programming: Concepts and Experiences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3136040.3136043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Staging has proved a successful technique for programmatically removing code abstractions, thereby allowing for faster program execution while retaining a high-level interface for the programmer. Unfortunately, techniques based on staging suffer from a number of problems — ranging from practicalities to fundamental limitations — which have prevented their widespread adoption. We introduce Quoted Staged Rewriting (QSR), an approach that uses type-safe, pattern matching-enabled quasiquotes to define optimizations. The approach is “staged” in two ways: first, rewrite rules can execute arbitrary code during pattern matching and code reconstruction, leveraging the power and flexibility of staging; second, library designers can orchestrate the application of successive rewriting phases (stages). The advantages of using quasiquote-based rewriting are that library designers never have to deal directly with the intermediate representation (IR), and that it allows for non-intrusive optimizations — in contrast with staging, it is not necessary to adapt the entire library and user programs to accommodate optimizations. We show how Squid, a Scala macro-based framework, enables QSR and renders library-defined optimizations more practical than ever before: library designers write domain-specific optimizers that users invoke transparently on delimited portions of their code base. As a motivating example we describe an implementation of stream fusion (a well-known deforestation technique) that is both simpler and more powerful than the state of the art, and can readily be used by Scala programmers with no knowledge of metaprogramming.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引用阶段重写:库定义优化的实用方法
Staging已被证明是一种成功的技术,可以通过编程方式移除代码抽象,从而在为程序员保留高级接口的同时加快程序执行速度。不幸的是,基于分期的技术存在许多问题——从实用性到基本限制——这些问题阻碍了它们的广泛采用。我们将介绍带引号的阶段重写(QSR),这是一种使用类型安全的、支持模式匹配的准引号来定义优化的方法。该方法以两种方式“分阶段”:首先,重写规则可以在模式匹配和代码重构期间执行任意代码,利用分阶段的强大功能和灵活性;其次,库设计者可以编排连续重写阶段(阶段)的应用程序。使用基于准引用的重写的优点是库设计人员不必直接处理中间表示(IR),并且它允许非侵入式优化——与分段相比,不需要调整整个库和用户程序来适应优化。我们将展示Squid(一个基于Scala宏的框架)如何支持QSR,并使库定义的优化比以往任何时候都更加实用:库设计人员编写特定于领域的优化器,用户可以在其代码库的分隔部分透明地调用。作为一个鼓舞人心的例子,我们描述了一个流融合(一种众所周知的毁林技术)的实现,它比目前的技术更简单、更强大,并且可以很容易地被没有元编程知识的Scala程序员使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the impact of natural language processing over feature location in models Rewriting a shallow DSL using a GHC compiler extension Avoiding useless mutants Towards compositional and generative tensor optimizations A Haskell compiler for signal transforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1