KOH wet mount versus cellophane strip without mounting medium for rapid diagnosis in superficial mycoses

S. Arora, R. Pal, Devinder Suhag, R. Dabas, Gulhima Arora, S. Chand
{"title":"KOH wet mount versus cellophane strip without mounting medium for rapid diagnosis in superficial mycoses","authors":"S. Arora, R. Pal, Devinder Suhag, R. Dabas, Gulhima Arora, S. Chand","doi":"10.4103/ijdpdd.ijdpdd_113_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Diagnosis of superficial mycoses in clinically doubtful cases relies on demonstration of fungal elements on a 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) slide mount which takes 30 min to 2 h. Rapid results will lead to reduced time to diagnosis. Aims: A comparative study of conventional 10% KOH wet mount against the cellophane strip method without a mounting medium under bright-field and phase-contrast microscopy was aimed to determine the comparative efficacy of these methods in demonstrating fungal elements of superficial mycoses. Settings and Design: The study was conducted at a skin center of a tertiary care hospital between November 2019 and January 2020. Material and Methods: One hundred and fifty consecutive clinically suspect cases of superficial cutaneous mycoses were examined. Skin scrapings for 10% KOH were collected with a blunt scalpel on one slide and examined half hour later. A cellophane strip collection of squames stuck onto another slide and examined directly by bright-field and phase-contrast microscopy. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was carried out in the present study using SPSS 22.0, and R environment version 3.2.2 was used for the analysis of the data. Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test was used to find the significance of study parameters on categorical scale between two or more groups, nonparametric setting for qualitative data analysis. Fisher’s exact test was used when samples were very small. Results: The mean percentage positivity for fungal hyphae as seen on KOH mount was 76%, for cellophane tape 97.33%, and under phase-contrast microscopy 97.33%. Pityriasis versicolor was detected by all three methods (100%). Tinea corporis had the least positive result on KOH mount. Conclusion: Cellophane strip method without a mounting medium adequately demonstrates fungal elements on light microscopy.","PeriodicalId":423971,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dermatopathology and Diagnostic Dermatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dermatopathology and Diagnostic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdpdd.ijdpdd_113_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Context: Diagnosis of superficial mycoses in clinically doubtful cases relies on demonstration of fungal elements on a 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) slide mount which takes 30 min to 2 h. Rapid results will lead to reduced time to diagnosis. Aims: A comparative study of conventional 10% KOH wet mount against the cellophane strip method without a mounting medium under bright-field and phase-contrast microscopy was aimed to determine the comparative efficacy of these methods in demonstrating fungal elements of superficial mycoses. Settings and Design: The study was conducted at a skin center of a tertiary care hospital between November 2019 and January 2020. Material and Methods: One hundred and fifty consecutive clinically suspect cases of superficial cutaneous mycoses were examined. Skin scrapings for 10% KOH were collected with a blunt scalpel on one slide and examined half hour later. A cellophane strip collection of squames stuck onto another slide and examined directly by bright-field and phase-contrast microscopy. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was carried out in the present study using SPSS 22.0, and R environment version 3.2.2 was used for the analysis of the data. Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test was used to find the significance of study parameters on categorical scale between two or more groups, nonparametric setting for qualitative data analysis. Fisher’s exact test was used when samples were very small. Results: The mean percentage positivity for fungal hyphae as seen on KOH mount was 76%, for cellophane tape 97.33%, and under phase-contrast microscopy 97.33%. Pityriasis versicolor was detected by all three methods (100%). Tinea corporis had the least positive result on KOH mount. Conclusion: Cellophane strip method without a mounting medium adequately demonstrates fungal elements on light microscopy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KOH湿贴片与无贴片玻璃纸条快速诊断浅表真菌病
背景:在临床可疑病例中,浅表真菌病的诊断依赖于在10%氢氧化钾(KOH)载玻片上显示真菌元素,这需要30分钟到2小时。快速的结果将缩短诊断时间。目的:在明光显微镜和相衬显微镜下,对比研究常规10% KOH湿贴片法和无贴片介质的玻璃纸条法,以确定这两种方法在显示浅表真菌成分方面的比较效果。环境和设计:该研究于2019年11月至2020年1月在一家三级护理医院的皮肤中心进行。材料与方法:对150例连续临床疑似皮肤浅表真菌病患者进行检查。用钝刀在一张载玻片上收集10% KOH的皮肤刮痕,半小时后检查。贴在另一张载玻片上的玻璃纸条,用明场和相衬显微镜直接检查。使用统计分析:本研究采用SPSS 22.0进行描述性统计和推断性统计分析,使用R环境3.2.2版本对数据进行分析。两组或两组以上研究参数在分类量表上的显著性采用卡方/费雪精确检验,定性数据分析采用非参数设置。费雪精确检验是在样本很小的情况下使用的。结果:真菌菌丝在KOH mount上的平均阳性率为76%,玻璃纸上的平均阳性率为97.33%,相差显微镜下的平均阳性率为97.33%。三种方法均检出率为100%。体癣在KOH检测中阳性结果最少。结论:玻璃纸条法在光学显微镜下能充分显示真菌成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cauliflower-like growth at an unusual site: A clinical diagnostic dilemma Blaschko-linear Becker’s naevus over lower limb: A case study and literature review Endogenous ochronosis/Alkaptonuria: A case report highlighting the correlation between dermoscopy and histopathology Amelanotic metastatic dermal melanoma with an unknown primary: A double diagnostic dilemma Adding insult to injury: Fatal rhino-orbital mucormycosis eventuating in cutaneous involvement post-SARS-COV2 infection in a young female
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1