Decentralisation to promote regional development in Indonesia

Petar Vujanovic
{"title":"Decentralisation to promote regional development in Indonesia","authors":"Petar Vujanovic","doi":"10.1787/D9CABD0A-EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1998 Indonesia embarked on an ambitious course of decentralisation. Over a period of a few years, facilitated by financial transfers from the central government, responsibility for many public services and administrative tasks were devolved to local authorities. This process is continuing. Regional development is now very much in the hands of the four sub-national tiers of government. However, the speed of the devolution means that much is being done without the required accompanying skills, technical capacities, resources and oversight. As a result, while good progress has been made nationally along a number dimensions, outcomes in health, education, infrastructure, corruption and the provision of other social services have not improved as quickly as was hoped, and the variance in results across the regions has been enormous. Rather than simply devolving more and more responsibilities to sub-national authorities, the central government needs to take a more strategic view of regional economic development. This includes monitoring the performance of sub-national governments, providing them with technical assistance where needed, encouraging them to emulate the best performers and in the short- to medium-term using grants to direct spending to priority areas. The inter-governmental transfer framework also would benefit from better oversight and a strategic vision. Moreover, the perverse incentives it embodies are driving rent-seeking and the fragmentation of local jurisdictions. In the longer term the objective should be tax autonomy and transfers based exclusively on block grants although this should be conditional on adequate oversight and administrative capacities within the sub-national authorities. Conflicting and overlapping laws and regulations across levels of government are also inhibiting regional development by obstructing private business development and investment. This Working Paper relates to the 2016 OECD Economic Survey of Indonesia (www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/economic-survey-indonesia.htm).","PeriodicalId":350343,"journal":{"name":"OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/D9CABD0A-EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In 1998 Indonesia embarked on an ambitious course of decentralisation. Over a period of a few years, facilitated by financial transfers from the central government, responsibility for many public services and administrative tasks were devolved to local authorities. This process is continuing. Regional development is now very much in the hands of the four sub-national tiers of government. However, the speed of the devolution means that much is being done without the required accompanying skills, technical capacities, resources and oversight. As a result, while good progress has been made nationally along a number dimensions, outcomes in health, education, infrastructure, corruption and the provision of other social services have not improved as quickly as was hoped, and the variance in results across the regions has been enormous. Rather than simply devolving more and more responsibilities to sub-national authorities, the central government needs to take a more strategic view of regional economic development. This includes monitoring the performance of sub-national governments, providing them with technical assistance where needed, encouraging them to emulate the best performers and in the short- to medium-term using grants to direct spending to priority areas. The inter-governmental transfer framework also would benefit from better oversight and a strategic vision. Moreover, the perverse incentives it embodies are driving rent-seeking and the fragmentation of local jurisdictions. In the longer term the objective should be tax autonomy and transfers based exclusively on block grants although this should be conditional on adequate oversight and administrative capacities within the sub-national authorities. Conflicting and overlapping laws and regulations across levels of government are also inhibiting regional development by obstructing private business development and investment. This Working Paper relates to the 2016 OECD Economic Survey of Indonesia (www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/economic-survey-indonesia.htm).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下放权力以促进印度尼西亚的区域发展
1998年,印尼开始了雄心勃勃的权力下放进程。在几年的时间里,在中央政府财政转移的推动下,许多公共服务和行政任务的责任下放给了地方当局。这一进程仍在继续。区域发展现在在很大程度上掌握在四个地方政府手中。然而,权力下放的速度意味着,很多工作是在没有必要的配套技能、技术能力、资源和监督的情况下完成的。因此,虽然全国在若干方面取得了良好进展,但在保健、教育、基础设施、腐败和提供其他社会服务方面的成果并没有像人们希望的那样迅速改善,而且各区域之间的成果差异很大。中央政府不应简单地将越来越多的责任下放给地方政府,而应以更具战略性的眼光看待区域经济发展。这包括监测地方政府的表现,在需要时向它们提供技术援助,鼓励它们效仿表现最好的国家,并在中短期内利用赠款将支出直接用于优先领域。政府间转移框架也将受益于更好的监督和战略眼光。此外,它所体现的不正当动机正在推动寻租和地方司法管辖区的分裂。从长期来看,目标应该是完全基于整体拨款的税收自治和转移,尽管这应以地方当局充分的监督和管理能力为条件。各级政府之间相互矛盾和重叠的法律法规也阻碍了民间企业的发展和投资,阻碍了地区发展。本工作文件涉及2016年经合组织印度尼西亚经济调查(www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/economic-survey-indonesia.htm)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Making Property Tax Reform Happen in China Executive summary Local Public Finance and Capacity Building in Asia Ageing and productivity growth in OECD regions: Combatting the economic impact of ageing through productivity growth? Managing across levels of government: The challenge of pension reform in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1