Therapeutic Armamentarium for Stricturing Crohn's Disease: Medical Versus Endoscopic Versus Surgical Approaches.

Shishira S. Bharadwaj, Bo Shen
{"title":"Therapeutic Armamentarium for Stricturing Crohn's Disease: Medical Versus Endoscopic Versus Surgical Approaches.","authors":"Shishira S. Bharadwaj, Bo Shen","doi":"10.1097/MIB.0000000000000683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One-third of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) present as stricturing phenotype characterized by progressive luminal narrowing and obstructive symptoms. The diagnosis and management of these patients have been intriguing and challenging. Immunomodulators and biologics have been successfully used in treating inflammatory and fistulizing CD. There are issues of efficacy and safety of biological agents in treating strictures in CD. Rapid mucosal healing from potent biological agents may predispose patients to the development of new strictures or worsening of existing strictures. On the other hand, strictures constitute one-fifth of the reasons for surgery in patients with CD. Disease recurrence is common at or proximal to the anastomotic site with the majority of these patients developing new endoscopic lesions within 1 year of surgery. The progressive nature of the disease with repetitive cycle of inflammation and stricture formation results in repeated surgery, with a risk of small bowel syndrome. There is considerable quest for bowel conserving endoscopic and surgical strategies. Endoscopic balloon dilation and stricturoplasty have emerged as valid alternatives to resection. Endoscopic balloon dilation has been shown to be feasible, safe, and effective for the short primary or anastomotic strictures. However, repeated dilations are often needed, and long-term outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilation remain to be investigated. The introduction of stricturoplasty has added another dimension to bowel saving strategy. Although postoperative recurrence rate after stricturoplasty is comparable with surgical resection, there are concerns for increased risk of malignancy in preserved bowel. Laparoscopic surgery has widely been performed with similar outcomes to open approach with fewer complications, quicker recovery, better cosmesis, and lower cost. All of these issues should be considered by physicians involved in the management of patients with stricturing CD.","PeriodicalId":339644,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Disease","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One-third of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) present as stricturing phenotype characterized by progressive luminal narrowing and obstructive symptoms. The diagnosis and management of these patients have been intriguing and challenging. Immunomodulators and biologics have been successfully used in treating inflammatory and fistulizing CD. There are issues of efficacy and safety of biological agents in treating strictures in CD. Rapid mucosal healing from potent biological agents may predispose patients to the development of new strictures or worsening of existing strictures. On the other hand, strictures constitute one-fifth of the reasons for surgery in patients with CD. Disease recurrence is common at or proximal to the anastomotic site with the majority of these patients developing new endoscopic lesions within 1 year of surgery. The progressive nature of the disease with repetitive cycle of inflammation and stricture formation results in repeated surgery, with a risk of small bowel syndrome. There is considerable quest for bowel conserving endoscopic and surgical strategies. Endoscopic balloon dilation and stricturoplasty have emerged as valid alternatives to resection. Endoscopic balloon dilation has been shown to be feasible, safe, and effective for the short primary or anastomotic strictures. However, repeated dilations are often needed, and long-term outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilation remain to be investigated. The introduction of stricturoplasty has added another dimension to bowel saving strategy. Although postoperative recurrence rate after stricturoplasty is comparable with surgical resection, there are concerns for increased risk of malignancy in preserved bowel. Laparoscopic surgery has widely been performed with similar outcomes to open approach with fewer complications, quicker recovery, better cosmesis, and lower cost. All of these issues should be considered by physicians involved in the management of patients with stricturing CD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
狭窄性克罗恩病的治疗器械:药物、内窥镜和手术方法。
三分之一的克罗恩病(CD)患者表现为狭窄型,其特征是进行性管腔狭窄和阻塞性症状。这些患者的诊断和管理一直是有趣和具有挑战性的。免疫调节剂和生物制剂已成功用于治疗炎症性和瘘管性乳糜泻。生物制剂治疗乳糜泻狭窄的有效性和安全性存在问题。强效生物制剂的黏膜快速愈合可能使患者易发生新的狭窄或使现有狭窄恶化。另一方面,狭窄占CD患者手术原因的五分之一。疾病在吻合口或近端复发很常见,大多数患者在手术后1年内出现新的内镜病变。该疾病的进行性,伴有反复循环的炎症和狭窄形成,导致反复手术,有发生小肠综合征的风险。对于保存肠道的内镜和手术策略有相当多的探索。内镜下球囊扩张和狭窄成形术已成为切除的有效替代方法。内镜下球囊扩张术对于原发性或吻合口狭窄是可行、安全、有效的。然而,经常需要重复扩张,内镜下球囊扩张的长期结果仍有待研究。狭窄成形术的引入为肠道保存策略增加了另一个维度。尽管狭窄成形术后的复发率与手术切除相当,但仍存在保留肠恶性肿瘤风险增加的担忧。腹腔镜手术已被广泛应用,其结果与开放式手术相似,并发症更少,恢复更快,美容效果更好,成本更低。所有这些问题都应该被参与管理狭窄性乳糜泻患者的医生考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inactivation of Digestive Proteases and Degradation of Mucus: The Possible Key Factors That Determined the Different Effects on the Gut by Antibiotics. P-099 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Sexual Function of Patients in a Mexican Population Damage of the Mucus Layer: The Possible Shared Critical Common Cause for Both Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). P-104 Association Between pANCA Status and Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-analysis The Ileitis of Ulcerative Colitis. Why Is It Not Crohn's Disease?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1