Should Process Management Add Its Two Cents?: A Classification Approach for the Selection of Process Management Build-Time Techniques for Software Development Purposes

Matthias Lederer, Remzi Avci, W. Schmidt
{"title":"Should Process Management Add Its Two Cents?: A Classification Approach for the Selection of Process Management Build-Time Techniques for Software Development Purposes","authors":"Matthias Lederer, Remzi Avci, W. Schmidt","doi":"10.1109/SEAA.2017.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In business process management, numerous established methods, good practices and techniques for the modeling and execution of workflows are known. Many of them are domain-independent, which means their application is also very promising for software development processes. However, the various approaches of software engineering are fundamentally different, so that not all techniques can be applied. This position paper initially collects 26 basic process characteristics (e.g., structurability, collaboration type). A generic classification schema is created, which gives recommendations for appropriate built-time technologies for existing processes. In order to make use of BPM's body of knowledge for software engineering, it was examined which techniques could be used for the two classic forms of the software development process (for example case management for agile processes versus variants of BPMN for traditional development processes).","PeriodicalId":151513,"journal":{"name":"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":"320 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In business process management, numerous established methods, good practices and techniques for the modeling and execution of workflows are known. Many of them are domain-independent, which means their application is also very promising for software development processes. However, the various approaches of software engineering are fundamentally different, so that not all techniques can be applied. This position paper initially collects 26 basic process characteristics (e.g., structurability, collaboration type). A generic classification schema is created, which gives recommendations for appropriate built-time technologies for existing processes. In order to make use of BPM's body of knowledge for software engineering, it was examined which techniques could be used for the two classic forms of the software development process (for example case management for agile processes versus variants of BPMN for traditional development processes).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流程管理应该增加它的两分钱吗?为软件开发目的选择过程管理构建时技术的分类方法
在业务流程管理中,已知有许多用于工作流建模和执行的既定方法、良好实践和技术。它们中的许多都是领域独立的,这意味着它们的应用程序对于软件开发过程也非常有前途。然而,软件工程的各种方法从根本上是不同的,因此并不是所有的技术都可以应用。这份意见书最初收集了26个基本流程特征(例如,可结构化性、协作类型)。创建了一个通用的分类模式,它为现有流程提供了适当的构建时技术建议。为了在软件工程中使用BPM的知识体系,我们研究了哪些技术可以用于软件开发过程的两种经典形式(例如,针对敏捷过程的案例管理与针对传统开发过程的BPMN变体)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patterns for Designing and Implementing an Environment for Software Start-Up Education Assessment of Agility in Software Organizations with a Web-Based Agility Assessment Tool Continuous practices and devops: beyond the buzz, what does it all mean? Guiding Quality Assurance for Mobile Applications with FIT4Apps — A Two-Step Evaluation A Literature Study on Privacy Patterns Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1