National Survey of Drug Information Centers Practice: Research and Publication System at Ministry of Health Hospitals in Saudi Arabia

Y. Alomi, S. Alghamdi, R. A. Alattyh
{"title":"National Survey of Drug Information Centers Practice: Research and Publication System at Ministry of Health Hospitals in Saudi Arabia","authors":"Y. Alomi, S. Alghamdi, R. A. Alattyh","doi":"10.5530/amdhs.2018.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore the National Survey of Drug Information Centers practice in Saudi Arabia: Research and Publications at MOH hospitals. Methods: It is a cross-sectional four months national survey of Drug Information Services at MOH. It contained ten domains with 181 questions designed by the authors. It was derived from Internal Pharmaceutical Federation, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists best practice guidelines. This survey was distributed to forty hospital pharmacies that run drug information services. In this study, the domain Research and Publications System was explored and analyzed. It consisted of eight questions about the written policy and procedure and application methods for Research and Publications at MOH system in the drug information centers. All analysis was done through survey monkey system. Results: The survey was distributed to 45 of hospitals, the response rate, was 40 (88.88%) hospitals. The highest score of investigational drug services was a written policy and procedure for IDS did not exist in 23 (57.5%) hospitals while only 6 (15%) of hospitals 100% applied the elements. The highest score of Pharmacy Professional Publications Services was the written policy and procedure for Professional Publications Services did not exist in 24 (60%) hospitals while only 6 (15%) of hospitals 100% applied the elements. The highest scores of Pharmacy Ethical and Legal Issues was a Written policy and procedure for Pharmacy Ethical and Legal did not exist in 20 (50%) hospitals while only 7 (17.5%) of hospitals 100% applied the elements. Conclusion: There was a weak implementation of Research and Publications system in drug information centers practice. An educating and training of drug information pharmacist on the Research and Publications system is required.in addition to setup up policy and procedures during the implementation of the services.","PeriodicalId":237766,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical, Dental and Health Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical, Dental and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/amdhs.2018.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To explore the National Survey of Drug Information Centers practice in Saudi Arabia: Research and Publications at MOH hospitals. Methods: It is a cross-sectional four months national survey of Drug Information Services at MOH. It contained ten domains with 181 questions designed by the authors. It was derived from Internal Pharmaceutical Federation, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists best practice guidelines. This survey was distributed to forty hospital pharmacies that run drug information services. In this study, the domain Research and Publications System was explored and analyzed. It consisted of eight questions about the written policy and procedure and application methods for Research and Publications at MOH system in the drug information centers. All analysis was done through survey monkey system. Results: The survey was distributed to 45 of hospitals, the response rate, was 40 (88.88%) hospitals. The highest score of investigational drug services was a written policy and procedure for IDS did not exist in 23 (57.5%) hospitals while only 6 (15%) of hospitals 100% applied the elements. The highest score of Pharmacy Professional Publications Services was the written policy and procedure for Professional Publications Services did not exist in 24 (60%) hospitals while only 6 (15%) of hospitals 100% applied the elements. The highest scores of Pharmacy Ethical and Legal Issues was a Written policy and procedure for Pharmacy Ethical and Legal did not exist in 20 (50%) hospitals while only 7 (17.5%) of hospitals 100% applied the elements. Conclusion: There was a weak implementation of Research and Publications system in drug information centers practice. An educating and training of drug information pharmacist on the Research and Publications system is required.in addition to setup up policy and procedures during the implementation of the services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全国药品信息中心实践调查:沙特阿拉伯卫生部医院的研究和出版系统
目的:探讨沙特阿拉伯药品信息中心实践的全国调查:卫生部医院的研究和出版物。方法:对卫生部药品信息服务部门进行为期4个月的全国横断面调查。它包含十个领域,由作者设计的181个问题。它来源于内部药物联合会,美国卫生系统药剂师协会最佳实践指南。本调查向40家提供药品信息服务的医院药房发放。本研究对领域研究与出版系统进行了探索与分析。包括8个问题,内容涉及卫生部系统在药品信息中心的研究和出版物的书面政策和程序以及申请方法。所有的分析都是通过调查猴子系统完成的。结果:共发放调查问卷45家医院,回复率为40家(88.88%)医院。在临床试验药品服务方面得分最高的是23家(57.5%)医院没有IDS的书面政策和程序,只有6家(15%)医院100%应用了这些要素。“药学专业出版服务”得分最高的是24家(60%)医院没有专业出版服务的书面政策和程序,只有6家(15%)医院100%应用了这些要素。“药学伦理与法律问题”得分最高的是20家(50%)医院没有“药学伦理与法律的书面政策和程序”,只有7家(17.5%)医院100%应用了这些要素。结论:在药品信息中心实践中,研究与发表制度的执行力度较弱。需要对药品信息药师进行研究和出版系统的教育和培训。除了在服务实施期间建立政策和程序之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does the Health Assessment Questionnaire have Potential as a Monitoring Tool for Cohorts with Arthritis in Quetta, Pakistan? A Case Report on Injection Site Abscess Due to Staphylococcus epidermidis Role of Micro and Macro Nutrients in Malnourished Children Attending Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Divisional Head Quarter Hospital, Dera Murad Jamali, Balochistan Awareness of COVID-19 among Pharmacy Students of Pakistan Case Report on the Management of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) Postpartum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1