Judicial protection of intellectual property rights to animal breeds in civil proceedings (comparative legal aspect)

Mariia Golubei
{"title":"Judicial protection of intellectual property rights to animal breeds in civil proceedings (comparative legal aspect)","authors":"Mariia Golubei","doi":"10.31548/law/1.2023.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of this study is conditioned upon the lack of specialized legal regulation concerning the breed of animals as an object of intellectual property, which considerably complicates the judicial protection of property and personal non-property rights. The purpose of this study was to investigate the civil legal protection of intellectual property rights for animal breeds in Ukraine, considering foreign practices. For the systematic study of Ukrainian and foreign legislation, formal-legal, logical-legal, comparative-legal, and other special methods were used. Through the analysis of the Ukrainian regulatory framework, it was found that the provisions of the patent legislation must be considered for the implementation of judicial protection of rights to animal breeds. The results of the study of the provisions of the specialized laws of Ukraine from the standpoint of civil legal protection of intellectual property rights were presented and the following methods of protection were highlighted, which by analogy can be applied to the animal breed: recognition of the right, change, or termination of the legal relationship, restoration of the position that existed before the violation of the right, recognition of the deed invalid, termination of infringing actions, compensation for damages and moral damage, forced performance of the obligation in kind. It was established that a special method of judicial protection of animal breed rights is the application of a one-time penalty in the form of a certain amount of money instead of compensation for damages. Using a comparative legal analysis of foreign practices, namely in the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, and Kyrgyzstan, it was discovered that the legal protection of animal breed rights is primarily determined by the presence of a protective legal document, such as a patent or certificate. The theoretical value of this paper is that this study is the first to analyse the issue of judicial civil law protection of animal breeds as an object of intellectual property law in Ukraine, while also factoring in the foreign practices. The practical value is that the study results can be used to eliminate gaps and conflicts in the legal regulation of animal breeds as objects of intellectual property. The proposals expressed in this paper can be considered in the legislative initiatives.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law. Human. Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law/1.2023.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of this study is conditioned upon the lack of specialized legal regulation concerning the breed of animals as an object of intellectual property, which considerably complicates the judicial protection of property and personal non-property rights. The purpose of this study was to investigate the civil legal protection of intellectual property rights for animal breeds in Ukraine, considering foreign practices. For the systematic study of Ukrainian and foreign legislation, formal-legal, logical-legal, comparative-legal, and other special methods were used. Through the analysis of the Ukrainian regulatory framework, it was found that the provisions of the patent legislation must be considered for the implementation of judicial protection of rights to animal breeds. The results of the study of the provisions of the specialized laws of Ukraine from the standpoint of civil legal protection of intellectual property rights were presented and the following methods of protection were highlighted, which by analogy can be applied to the animal breed: recognition of the right, change, or termination of the legal relationship, restoration of the position that existed before the violation of the right, recognition of the deed invalid, termination of infringing actions, compensation for damages and moral damage, forced performance of the obligation in kind. It was established that a special method of judicial protection of animal breed rights is the application of a one-time penalty in the form of a certain amount of money instead of compensation for damages. Using a comparative legal analysis of foreign practices, namely in the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, and Kyrgyzstan, it was discovered that the legal protection of animal breed rights is primarily determined by the presence of a protective legal document, such as a patent or certificate. The theoretical value of this paper is that this study is the first to analyse the issue of judicial civil law protection of animal breeds as an object of intellectual property law in Ukraine, while also factoring in the foreign practices. The practical value is that the study results can be used to eliminate gaps and conflicts in the legal regulation of animal breeds as objects of intellectual property. The proposals expressed in this paper can be considered in the legislative initiatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民事诉讼中动物品种知识产权的司法保护(比较法学方面)
这项研究的相关性取决于缺乏关于作为知识产权客体的动物品种的专门法律规定,这使财产和个人非财产权利的司法保护相当复杂。本研究的目的是考察乌克兰动物品种知识产权的民事法律保护,并结合国外的做法。对于乌克兰和外国立法的系统研究,使用了形式法、逻辑法、比较法和其他特殊方法。通过对乌克兰监管框架的分析,发现对动物品种权利实施司法保护必须考虑专利立法的规定。从知识产权民事法律保护的角度对乌克兰专门法律的规定进行了研究,并提出了以下保护方法,这些方法可以类比地适用于动物品种:承认权利、变更或终止法律关系、恢复权利被侵犯前的地位、承认契约无效、终止侵权行为、损害赔偿和精神损害赔偿、以实物强制履行义务。确立了动物品种权司法保护的一种特殊方法是采用一定金额的一次性处罚代替损害赔偿。通过对国外实践,即捷克共和国、保加利亚和吉尔吉斯斯坦的比较法律分析,我们发现动物品种权的法律保护主要取决于是否存在保护性法律文件,如专利或证书。本文的理论价值在于,本研究在借鉴国外实践的基础上,首次分析了乌克兰作为知识产权法律客体的动物品种民事司法保护问题。实用价值在于,研究结果可用于消除动物品种作为知识产权客体的法律规制中的空白和冲突。本文提出的建议可在立法措施中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative liability of juveniles for smoking Epistemological construction doctrine of the veterinary care defect phenomenon in forensic veterinary examination International experience in the use of alternative energy sources (within the European Union) Confiscation as a special sign of protection of intellectual property rights The role of collective-contractual regulation in ensuring the right of agricultural workers to a safe and healthy working environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1