Policy Forum: Canada's Proposed Cryptoasset Legislation

Robert G. Kreklewetz, Laura J. Burlock
{"title":"Policy Forum: Canada's Proposed Cryptoasset Legislation","authors":"Robert G. Kreklewetz, Laura J. Burlock","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2023.71.1.pf.kreklewetz","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cryptoasset miners verify and record transactions, maintaining the integrity and security of the blockchain network. The Department of Finance (\"Finance\") has recently proposed new Excise Tax Act (ETA) provisions regarding the goods and services tax (GST)/harmonized sales tax (HST) treatment of crypto mining. Under these proposed provisions, crypto mining activities provided to anonymous recipients will not be subject to GST/HST, but the crypto miners performing these activities will also not be eligible to recover any GST/HST paid on their business inputs (and thus will be forced to bear the brunt of the tax themselves). We believe that Finance's decision to tax what it can identify—the business inputs of Canadian crypto miners—is a roughly balanced but reasonable approach. Although Finance might be legitimately criticized as departing from Canada's decision to eliminate the cascading of tax found in the former origin-based federal sales tax, it seems impossible to administer a destination-based transactional tax such as the GST/HST when faced with \"anonymous\" recipients (the users of the crypto miner's services). Finance appears to have minimized the cascading of tax by including a carve-out for identifiable recipients of a crypto miner's services, allowing the regular zero-rating rules in the ETA to apply in limited circumstances. In the face of utter uncertainty, Finance's reactive approach is likely the best that it can do. Given the rapid evolution and inherent decentralization of the crypto space, a more broadly based proactive approach would seem imprudent at this time.","PeriodicalId":375948,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","volume":"180 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2023.71.1.pf.kreklewetz","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cryptoasset miners verify and record transactions, maintaining the integrity and security of the blockchain network. The Department of Finance ("Finance") has recently proposed new Excise Tax Act (ETA) provisions regarding the goods and services tax (GST)/harmonized sales tax (HST) treatment of crypto mining. Under these proposed provisions, crypto mining activities provided to anonymous recipients will not be subject to GST/HST, but the crypto miners performing these activities will also not be eligible to recover any GST/HST paid on their business inputs (and thus will be forced to bear the brunt of the tax themselves). We believe that Finance's decision to tax what it can identify—the business inputs of Canadian crypto miners—is a roughly balanced but reasonable approach. Although Finance might be legitimately criticized as departing from Canada's decision to eliminate the cascading of tax found in the former origin-based federal sales tax, it seems impossible to administer a destination-based transactional tax such as the GST/HST when faced with "anonymous" recipients (the users of the crypto miner's services). Finance appears to have minimized the cascading of tax by including a carve-out for identifiable recipients of a crypto miner's services, allowing the regular zero-rating rules in the ETA to apply in limited circumstances. In the face of utter uncertainty, Finance's reactive approach is likely the best that it can do. Given the rapid evolution and inherent decentralization of the crypto space, a more broadly based proactive approach would seem imprudent at this time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策论坛:加拿大拟议的加密资产立法
加密资产矿工验证和记录交易,维护区块链网络的完整性和安全性。财政部(“财政部”)最近提出了关于加密货币挖矿的商品和服务税(GST)/协调销售税(HST)处理的新消费税法案(ETA)条款。根据这些拟议的规定,提供给匿名收件人的加密货币挖矿活动将不受GST/HST的约束,但执行这些活动的加密货币矿工也将没有资格收回其业务投入所支付的任何GST/HST(因此将被迫自己承担税收的冲击)。我们认为,财政部决定对其可以识别的东西(加拿大加密矿工的业务投入)征税,是一种大致平衡但合理的方法。尽管财政部可能会受到合理的批评,因为它偏离了加拿大取消前基于原产地的联邦销售税中发现的级联税的决定,但在面对“匿名”收款人(加密矿工服务的用户)时,似乎不可能管理基于目的地的交易税,如GST/HST。金融部门似乎通过对加密矿工服务的可识别接收者进行分割,将税收的级联降到最低,允许ETA中的常规零评级规则在有限的情况下适用。面对完全的不确定性,《金融时报》的反应性方法可能是它所能做的最好的办法。鉴于加密空间的快速发展和固有的去中心化,在这个时候,一个更广泛的主动方法似乎是不谨慎的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
False Statement or Omission Penalties in Canadian Tax Law Policy Forum: Some Reflections on Ethical Considerations in Tax Litigation Canadian Tax Foundation Awards/Prix de la Fondation canadienne de fiscalité Finances of the Nation: Survey of Provincial and Territorial Budgets, 2023-24 Policy Forum: Editors' Introduction—Ethics and Taxation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1